fix: output_bytes metric in hash aggregation - #23777
Conversation
Codecov Report❌ Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #23777 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 80.89% 80.98% +0.08%
==========================================
Files 1102 1104 +2
Lines 376111 378992 +2881
Branches 376111 378992 +2881
==========================================
+ Hits 304251 306921 +2670
- Misses 53753 53829 +76
- Partials 18107 18242 +135 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
|
Hi @ariel-miculas! I was taking a look at the failing CI checks to see if I could help unblock this. Fixing that one word should turn the CI green. Hope this helps, and great work on the hash aggregation metrics! |
|
@2010YOUY01 coud you please take a look? |
|
Is it possible to implement it entirely within the Also let's add some end-to-end tests, ideally we can do it with |
ab748ff to
8995ed6
Compare
I don't see how, since
Added an |
|
Closed and reopen to see if the test failure in an unrelated ordered_aggregate_spill.slt is transient: |
Which issue does this PR close?
Rationale for this change
Summing together the produced sliced RecordBatches in hash aggregation leads to inflated output_bytes metric
What changes are included in this PR?
Are these changes tested?
Yes
Are there any user-facing changes?
If the metrics are user-facing, then yes.