Fix order-sensitive thread pool status test#16300
Open
yuzhiyang1 wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## 3.3 #16300 +/- ##
============================================
- Coverage 60.80% 60.79% -0.02%
+ Complexity 11766 11765 -1
============================================
Files 1953 1953
Lines 89188 89188
Branches 13454 13454
============================================
- Hits 54235 54223 -12
- Misses 29391 29399 +8
- Partials 5562 5566 +4
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
Contributor
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changed
Why
NonDex can shuffle the internal map iteration order, which makes the previous full-message equality assertion flaky even though the checker result is semantically correct.
Fixes #16152
Validation