-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 579
REST: Add retry and timeout configuration for REST catalog #3418
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
+313
−5
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
11 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
9d85042
REST: Add retry and timeout configuration for REST catalog
rahulsmahadev 6fb87ff
Address review feedback: explicit options, exercise retries, fix mypy
rahulsmahadev afb1f51
Fix mypy: proxies type must be Mapping, not MutableMapping
rahulsmahadev 47a5382
Address review nits from @rambleraptor
rahulsmahadev 9a799c6
Surface typed exceptions on retry exhaustion
rahulsmahadev 36053c7
Address review feedback: flat rest.client.* connection properties
rahulsmahadev afa6685
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/main' into rahul/rest-retry-ti…
rahulsmahadev 6c52148
Fix mypy unused-ignore in REST client timeout test
rahulsmahadev bcbee0a
Address review: reuse property helpers and align timeout with Java cl…
rahulsmahadev 8822073
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/main' into rahul/rest-retry-ti…
rahulsmahadev 1597e4b
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/main' into rahul/rest-retry-ti…
rahulsmahadev File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Some comments aren't visible on the classic Files Changed page.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think there's a pretty significant issue here. The
Retrypolicy will raise aRetryErrorinstead of returning the failure code. This means the exception mapping is then broken which impacts how we handle error codes.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good catch — fixed in 9a799c6. Added
raise_on_status=Falseso urllib3 returns the final 5xx response instead of raisingMaxRetryError/RetryErroron exhaustion. The response then flows through_handle_non_200_responseand is mapped to the typed exception (ServiceUnavailableErrorfor 503, etc.). Safe becausestatus_forcelistis hard-coded to transient codes only — 4xx codes are never retried and reach the same mapping unchanged.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Great catch, thanks for the extra review!