Skip to content

Security: aquitaine/OpenDisplay

Security

SECURITY.md

Security policy

Reporting a vulnerability

Please report security issues privately, not in public issues. Use GitHub's private vulnerability reporting (Security → Report a vulnerability) or email security@opendisplay.example (placeholder — replace before public launch).

We aim to acknowledge reports promptly, work on a fix under coordinated disclosure, and credit reporters who wish to be named. Supported-version and disclosure-timeline details will be finalized before the first public release.

Scope & threat model (summary)

OpenDisplay reasons about these primary threats (PRD §14.1):

Threat Control
Malicious local automation request Authenticated gateway, loopback default, non-bypassable safety checks, rate limits, audit log
Compromised provider/dependency Minimal dependencies, provider isolation, SBOM, review, signing
Leaked display/network identifiers Local-only storage; hash/redact on export; no analytics by default
Capture without clear consent On-demand permission, active indicator, stop on lock/logout
Update incompatibility (black screen / startup loop) Signed updates, OS compatibility flags, safe-mode migration, experimental defaults off
Corrupt settings/import Schema validation, atomic writes, backups, quarantine, recovery-first startup
Stolen API token Keychain, scoped/rotatable token, LAN off by default, audit & revoke
Supply-chain tampering Protected branches, reproducible metadata, checksums, notarization, provenance/SBOM

Privacy defaults

No analytics, crash upload, network discovery, HTTP listener, screen capture, or LAN access on a fresh install. Diagnostics are opt-in and previewable. Display serials, EDID, and network identifiers are treated as potentially identifying; logs use pseudonymous IDs and secrets live only in the Keychain — never in exported settings or support bundles.

Secure development

Threat model and security review are required for the lifecycle provider, rescue IPC, update channel, and local API before 1.0. Dependencies are pinned and scanned; high/critical findings block release.

There aren't any published security advisories