Would your strategy have survived your prop firm's rules?

1. Send your strategy the way you trade it: text, screenshot, TradingView script, EA or video notes.
2. Within 24 h you get a one-page rule sheet to confirm, free, always.
3. I test it on 12 months of real data against your firm's daily-loss, max-loss and target rules. In 72 h after rule freeze and funding you know: passed, failed or broke a limit, and on which day.

Free Challenge Pre-Check · Free Challenge Calculator

Direct: first 5 traders free, next 5 €49, then €99. The live register on the offer page controls availability. Existing marketplace contacts stay on their marketplace at its catalogue price. Less than a fifth of a typical challenge fee.

You release payment only after you've seen the report. If it shows you nothing about your strategy you didn't already know, you get your money back. On marketplaces, payment and any refund follow the platform's escrow and refund rules.

After the Pre-Check: Challenge-Ready Path (CR499) or EA Build (E149), with the actual T99 amount credited once within 30 days. CR499 includes the test, two named prop overlays, bot, one rule-change retest and three months of care.

Historical simulation, not a forecast. Prices and execution can differ by feed and broker. Missing intraday equity can leave a prop-rule check inconclusive. Three agreed rule cases check implementation, not a future challenge pass.

Already have a bot that misbehaves? I also fix one reproducible MT4/MT5 defect with three agreed tests. R49: 49 USD / 48 hours after source review and funding.

My published examples show the rules, source, historical test record and limits:

• Opening-range breakout: one frozen EURUSD M15 strategy in the HolaPrime MT5 Strategy Tester. The named prop-rule verdict remains inconclusive because the full-year server-clock mapping was not established.
• London-morning proxy: a separate historical MT5 case with its source, costs and failure limits.
• Pine versus MT5 signal comparison: 507 shared EURUSD H1 bars and 16 explained differences. This compares signals, not orders or returns.

Historical tests are not forecasts or proof of a prop challenge result.

• Public engineering portfolio
• Pine Script timing and alert tools
• Public MQL5 profile
• Contact

#TestedBeforeRisked

• PropGuard MT5 drawdown risk dashboard
• Multi-symbol wick rejection scanner
• Modern dark-mode one-click MT5 trade panel
• cTrader boundary lab : 15 deterministic tests for ownership, session, pending-expiry and restart-baseline policy.
• R49 original HolaPrime Experts log: three synthetic repair cases moved from 2/3 to 3/3 in my MT5 terminal; no client-order result.
• E149 original HolaPrime tester log: a completed-bar signal, close retcode 10009 and verified opposite tester position on generated one-minute OHLC ticks; no live order.

These are public engineering examples, not trading-performance claims.

• MT5 Position and Order Ownership Audit : classify open exposure against one expected EA magic number before a management or recovery repair.
• MT5 Deal Evidence Toolkit : export and compare stored tester-versus-deployment deal evidence under a fixed 19-field contract.
• MT5 EA Acceptance Harness : run eight synthetic timing, duplicate, cooldown and daily-lock fixtures without sending trades.
• MT5 Cash Risk Probe : inspect account-currency sizing and broker volume boundaries without placing an order.
• MT5 Order Preflight : check hypothetical order geometry against current symbol constraints.

All five utilities are read-only engineering evidence. They do not validate a strategy or promise execution or performance results.

1. Confirm entry, exit, risk, timing and edge-case rules.
2. Freeze a short specification and acceptance examples.
3. Implement and test against the approved behaviour.
4. Deliver editable source, compiled build, documented inputs and setup notes as agreed.

Trading results remain uncertain. I do not decompile protected EX4/EX5 files.