chore: bump grpc and x/net for GO-2026-6061 and GO-2026-4918 - #28
Merged
Conversation
govulncheck reports both as called from this SDK, not merely required: grpc v1.81.1 and x/net v0.51.0.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
govulncheck reported 6 vulnerabilities your code calls here — not just requires. Two were fixable by bumping:
google.golang.org/grpcgolang.org/x/netAfter the bump,
govulncheck ./...reports no module-level called vulnerabilities. The 4 remaining called findings are all Go standard library (crypto/tls,crypto/x509,net/textproto,net,net/http) and are fixed by building with Go >= 1.26.5; they cannot be resolved from go.mod, since a library inherits the consumer toolchain. Scan was run on go1.26.2 locally.Verification
Ran the full integration suite against a live server built from
authorizer@main, across all three transports (graphql / rest / grpc):Worth recording for whoever runs these next: the suite fails wholesale against a default-configured server, and neither failure is the SDK.
--disable-mfa=trueis required, orLoginreturns a TOTP challenge with a nilAccessTokeninstead of a token--rate-limit-rps=0is required, or the run tripsrate_limit_exceededpartway and every later test fails its signup prerequisiteWithout those two flags the results flip depending on run order, which is what made the first comparison look like the bump had changed behaviour. It had not.