Skip to content

Remove cache-from and cache-to options in workflow#489

Open
mimartin12 wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
update-lite-build
Open

Remove cache-from and cache-to options in workflow#489
mimartin12 wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
update-lite-build

Conversation

@mimartin12
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

🎟️ Tracking

None

📔 Objective

After some observation, we are getting an average of 6% cache. With caching enabled, the action exports the layers to GHA cache. This action alone can take over 90 seconds. The 6% cache tradeoff isn't great, so we can remove this config.

Example: 24083718350, 5% cache hit, cache upload 191 seconds.

📸 Screenshots

⏰ Reminders before review

  • Contributor guidelines followed
  • All formatters and local linters executed and passed
  • Written new unit and / or integration tests where applicable
  • Protected functional changes with optionality (feature flags)
  • Used internationalization (i18n) for all UI strings
  • CI builds passed
  • Communicated to DevOps any deployment requirements
  • Updated any necessary documentation (Confluence, contributing docs) or informed the documentation team

🦮 Reviewer guidelines

  • 👍 (:+1:) or similar for great changes
  • 📝 (:memo:) or ℹ️ (:information_source:) for notes or general info
  • ❓ (:question:) for questions
  • 🤔 (:thinking:) or 💭 (:thought_balloon:) for more open inquiry that's not quite a confirmed issue and could potentially benefit from discussion
  • 🎨 (:art:) for suggestions / improvements
  • ❌ (:x:) or ⚠️ (:warning:) for more significant problems or concerns needing attention
  • 🌱 (:seedling:) or ♻️ (:recycle:) for future improvements or indications of technical debt
  • ⛏ (:pick:) for minor or nitpick changes

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link
Copy Markdown

sonarqubecloud bot commented Apr 7, 2026

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Apr 7, 2026

Logo
Checkmarx One – Scan Summary & Details4e47ca4b-5c42-4679-b402-aa0ad664af1c

Great job! No new security vulnerabilities introduced in this pull request

@mimartin12 mimartin12 marked this pull request as ready for review April 7, 2026 20:08
@mimartin12 mimartin12 requested a review from a team as a code owner April 7, 2026 20:08
@mimartin12 mimartin12 requested a review from keithhubner April 7, 2026 20:08
@mimartin12 mimartin12 enabled auto-merge (squash) April 14, 2026 17:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant