Optimize image size and XMLTV runtime resources - #1
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changed
/datauvloop, andhttptoolswhile removing bytecode and unused Uvicorn extras from the imageWhy
Large or concurrent XMLTV imports retained two full Python representations while downloads and decompressed documents lived in a RAM-backed
/tmp. This caused avoidable RAM and CPU spikes. The runtime image also embedded bytecode and unused server dependencies.Measured impact
A 100,000-programme / 16 MiB synthetic feed dropped from 96.4 MiB peak traced Python allocations to 2.1 MiB. The disk spool was 12.7 MiB. A fresh production virtualenv dropped from 43 MiB to 41 MiB even before accounting for the 20.9 MiB of bytecode present in the published Linux layer.
Validation
849e860670ebwith existing data preserved