Skip to content

Conversation

@NathanZlion
Copy link
Member

Description

Related links, issue #, if available: n/a

How has this been tested?

Review checklist

The following items are to be evaluated by the author(s) and the reviewer(s).

Correctness

  • Changes include appropriate documentation updates.
  • Changes are backward-compatible if not indicated, see CONTRIBUTING.md.
  • Changes do not include unsupported browser features, see CONTRIBUTING.md.
  • Changes were manually tested for accessibility, see accessibility guidelines.

Security

Testing

  • Changes are covered with new/existing unit tests?
  • Changes are covered with new/existing integration tests?

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify, copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the terms of your choice.

@NathanZlion NathanZlion force-pushed the dev-v3-natidere-testing-pagescanner branch from 3a008d0 to 789ceea Compare January 7, 2026 13:18
const cellPosition = colIndex + (props.selectionType ? 2 : 1);

return {
selector: `tbody tr:nth-child(${rowNumber}) > :nth-child(${cellPosition}) .${analyticsSelectors['body-cell-content']}`,
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Would it be possible here instead to do something based on tr:has(input:checked) so that we don't have to loop through all selected items here? I'm a little worried about the potential performance impact of doing it this way

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants