Skip to content

feat(site): add local/dev stack proof demo page#221

Merged
GsCommand merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
codex/add-proof-demo-page-for-developer
May 20, 2026
Merged

feat(site): add local/dev stack proof demo page#221
GsCommand merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
codex/add-proof-demo-page-for-developer

Conversation

@GsCommand
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Motivation

  • Provide a developer-facing, local/dev proof demo that documents the canonical CommandLayer stack flow and expected verification outcomes without claiming production availability.
  • Make the canonical proof envelope and required metadata explicit so integrators can implement canonicalization, hashing, and signature verification correctly.

Description

  • Added public/stack-proof-demo.html containing the canonical flow, a sample canonical proof envelope, and expected VerifyAgent outcomes (VERIFIED / INVALID).
  • The demo includes metadata.proof.canonicalization = json.sorted_keys.v1, metadata.proof.hash.alg = SHA-256, and metadata.proof.signature.alg = Ed25519 in the example envelope.
  • Added a "Run it locally" block that references runtime: npm test, verifyagent: npm run e2e:runtime, and mcp-server: npm test, plus an architecture text diagram and trust-model warnings.
  • Added a CTA link from public/docs.html to the new public/stack-proof-demo.html page.

Testing

  • Ran npm install, which completed successfully.
  • Ran npm run build, which failed due to a missing build script in package.json.
  • Ran npm test (node --test tests/*.test.js), and the test suite passed (20 tests passed, 0 failed).

Codex Task

@vercel
Copy link
Copy Markdown

vercel Bot commented May 20, 2026

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated (UTC)
commandlayer-commandlayer-org Ready Ready Preview, Comment May 20, 2026 1:35am
commandlayer-org Ready Ready Preview, Comment May 20, 2026 1:35am
commandlayer-org111 Ready Ready Preview, Comment May 20, 2026 1:35am

Request Review

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant