Skip to content

Conversation

@mgorny
Copy link
Contributor

@mgorny mgorny commented Feb 9, 2026

Checklist

  • Used a personal fork of the feedstock to propose changes
  • Bumped the build number (if the version is unchanged)
  • Reset the build number to 0 (if the version changed)
  • Re-rendered with the latest conda-smithy (Use the phrase @conda-forge-admin, please rerender in a comment in this PR for automated rerendering)
  • Ensured the license file is being packaged.

This is split from #842 to fix build-details.json in Python 3.14, as suggested by @rgommers. Given that this file is new to Python 3.14 and the current version is pretty broken per se, it's unlikely for this to actually cause any issues.

Install `build-details.json` from shared library build rather than the
static build, as the latter does not include the data needed to build
extensions, and therefore it is not useful for cross-compilation.
This is backported from conda-forge#842, but unlike that PR it should not break
anything.

Signed-off-by: Michał Górny <mgorny@quansight.com>
Add the `ripgrep` dependency that is used in the `prefix-replacement`
test.  Since it is missing, the test never really greps and therefore
does not actually test.

Signed-off-by: Michał Górny <mgorny@quansight.com>
@conda-forge-admin
Copy link
Contributor

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipe/meta.yaml) and found it was in an excellent condition.

I do have some suggestions for making it better though...

For recipe/meta.yaml:

  • ℹ️ The recipe is not parsable by parser conda-souschef (grayskull). This parser is not currently used by conda-forge, but may be in the future. We are collecting information to see which recipes are compatible with grayskull.
  • ℹ️ The recipe is not parsable by parser conda-recipe-manager. The recipe can only be automatically migrated to the new v1 format if it is parseable by conda-recipe-manager.

This message was generated by GitHub Actions workflow run https://github.com/conda-forge/conda-forge-webservices/actions/runs/21838650228. Examine the logs at this URL for more detail.

@conda-forge-admin conda-forge-admin merged commit 02184ce into conda-forge:main Feb 9, 2026
27 checks passed
@conda-forge-admin
Copy link
Contributor

Hi! This is the friendly conda-forge automerge bot!

I considered the following status checks when analyzing this PR:

  • linter: passed
  • azure: passed

Thus the PR was passing and merged! Have a great day!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

automerge Merge the PR when CI passes

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants