Skip to content

Revert "chore(deps-dev): bump eslint-config-next from 15.5.26 to 16.3… - #73

Merged
csupenn merged 1 commit into
devfrom
fix/revert-69-eslint-config-next-16
Sep 28, 2026
Merged

csupenn merged 1 commit into
devfrom
fix/revert-69-eslint-config-next-16

Conversation

@csupenn

@csupenn csupenn commented Sep 28, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

….6 (#69)"

This reverts commit 794ce39, reversing changes made to 1f78097.

What and why

How it was verified

  • pnpm type-check and pnpm lint (0 errors)
  • pnpm test:ci (tests + coverage thresholds)
  • pnpm build, and affected pages checked on a local production build
  • Security fixes: a test that fails on the old code for the right reason, and passes now

Public claims (README, pages, blog, images, badges)

  • Every feature or number mentioned exists on main and is described at its real scope
  • Sample or demo data is labeled as such where people see it
  • No absolute security/compliance wording ("secure", "compliant", "sandboxed") without a scope
  • Images show nothing the product doesn't do
  • The public-claims guard passes (lib/__tests__/public-claims.test.ts)

Privacy and security

  • No user content, keys or IPs added to logs
  • New outbound requests go through the SSRF guard; new write endpoints check who is asking

….6 (#69)"

This reverts commit 794ce39, reversing
changes made to 1f78097.
@vercel

vercel Bot commented Sep 28, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated
top-flow Ready Ready Preview Sep 28, 2026 1:43am UTC

@csupenn
csupenn merged commit 6106c8e into dev Sep 28, 2026
5 checks passed
@csupenn
csupenn deleted the fix/revert-69-eslint-config-next-16 branch September 28, 2026 02:11

This branch was successfully deployed

1 active deployment
Preview — 2e0212f9 Deployed Sep 28, 2026 by vercel[bot]
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant