Skip to content

update translation of traditioanl chinese based on english version dated at 2026/6/15. - #618

Merged
NSoiffer merged 22 commits into
daisy:mainfrom
hjy1210:digit-tw
Aug 12, 2026
Merged

update translation of traditioanl chinese based on english version dated at 2026/6/15.#618
NSoiffer merged 22 commits into
daisy:mainfrom
hjy1210:digit-tw

Conversation

@hjy1210

@hjy1210 hjy1210 commented Jun 30, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

update translation of traditioanl chinese based on english version dated at 2026/6/15.

hjy1210 added 20 commits June 17, 2026 13:44
…缺兩個 rule,變動架構十幾個, 英文版的 literal-default (mroot)有問題。geometry.yaml 缺一個rule。對數的底改成底數。
… covariance, zero-matrix, identity-matrix, dimension-by

修改msubsup-skip-super, log, multi-line, default-multiline/mtr, default-multiline/mtd, simple-small-matrix, default-matrix/determinant
保留 intervals 與 absolute-value。
chemistry.rs 增加 dropped_msubsup_bug_358()
…x_intent, infix_intent_no_args(), infix_intent_one_arg(), function_intent(), function_no_args_intent(), function_one_arg_intent(),
SimpleSpeak_Rules.yaml/per-fraction(fraction)
definitions/NavigationParts add absolute-value, minus, vector, magnitude. Unicode/top paren/bottom paren. unicode/at sign,as
@rileeki rileeki moved this from Triage to In review in MathCAT Project Board Jul 28, 2026
@NSoiffer

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Apologies for the delay in getting to this. I've been away for four weeks.

I see that a number of tests have been changed to use some English. I want to verify that this is intended. For example:

-  test("zh-tw", "SimpleSpeak", expr, "大寫 m 的 轉置")?;
+  test("zh-tw", "SimpleSpeak", expr, "大寫 m transpose")?;

@hjy1210

hjy1210 commented Aug 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@NSoiffer
About

-  test("zh-tw", "SimpleSpeak", expr, "大寫 m 的 轉置")?;
+  test("zh-tw", "SimpleSpeak", expr, "大寫 m transpose")?;

Yes, it is intended. Similar to trace, homomorphism, norm, kernel.

@hjy1210

hjy1210 commented Aug 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@NSoiffer

At Jun 30, commit e4006a4, already pass all checks with Rust/Pre Release skipped.

Last week, this pull request response file conflicts with main branch, I resolved the conflicts and make a commit 6b5eaa6, pass all checks with Rust/Pre Release skipped again.

Yesterday, this pull request response file conflicts with main branch again, I resolved the conflicts and make a commit 121c3af, pass all checks with Rust/Pre Release skipped again.

I wonder why? Why I need to resolve conflicts many times? My procedure steps is not correct?

It seems some action(not by me) may make changes to zh/tw files.

@NSoiffer

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

I'm not great with github and sometimes run into those issues. Don't worry too much about them -- I'll resolve them always to favor your commits.

@NSoiffer
NSoiffer merged commit d0c900b into daisy:main Aug 12, 2026
8 checks passed
@github-project-automation github-project-automation Bot moved this from In review to Done in MathCAT Project Board Aug 12, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

Status: Done

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants