Skip to content

About

Wavegazer Net: FSOT visual equivalent of U-Net. Zero trainable weights. Cell detect @ 7 µm. Not FlowNet (optical flow).

Topics

Resources

Stars

0 stars

Watchers

0 watching

Forks

Repository files navigation

Wavegazer Net

A visual segmentation network equivalent to U-Net, built from Fluid Spacetime Omni-Theory (FSOT) instead of fitted convolution weights.

The working title was “Flow Net”. That name already belongs to FlowNet (Dosovitskiy et al., ICCV 2015, optical flow). This project is Wavegazer Net. See docs/NAME.md.

The control is a frozen canonical U-Net. The candidate is WavegazerNet: same U-graph and tensor contract, every interior box replaced by a named FSOT operator (codon mix, (D_{\mathrm{eff}}) fold, bleed skip, collapse head). Zero trainable parameters. Pin D1D38A.

See docs/00_BASELINE_CONTRACT.md and docs/06_FSOT_COMPONENT_MAP.md.

Where it lives

Platform URL
GitHub https://github.com/dappalumbo91/Wavegazer-Net
Hugging Face https://huggingface.co/dappalumbo91/Wavegazer-Net
Kaggle https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/damianpalumbo/wavegazer-net

What is in here

Path Role
docs/NAME.md Why the project is not called FlowNet
docs/00_BASELINE_CONTRACT.md Frozen in/out shapes, metrics, comparison rules
docs/01_ARCHITECTURE.md How a U-Net is built and why the U exists
docs/02_MATHEMATICS.md Conv, pool, skip, softmax, weighted CE, Dice, He init
docs/03_OBSERVED_OUTCOMES.md Published EM / cell-tracking / nnU-Net / Carvana numbers
docs/04_STANDARD_BUILD.md 2015 paper recipe and the nnU-Net-era recipe
docs/05_SCHEMATIC.md Architecture and pipeline drawings
docs/schematics/ SVG schematics (exact labels)
docs/papers/ U-Net, FCN, 3D U-Net, nnU-Net PDFs
vendor/Pytorch-UNet/ milesial 2D PyTorch U-Net (GPL-3.0, read only)
vendor/dynamic-network-architectures/ MIC-DKFZ PlainConvUNet used by nnU-Net (Apache-2.0)
src/wavegazer/ BaselineUNet (control) + WavegazerNet (FSOT) + losses/metrics
docs/06_FSOT_COMPONENT_MAP.md Box-by-box replacement table
docs/07_COMPETITOR_SCOREBOARD.md Field metrics: 3D detect 1.0, hybrid linker adj_edge_jaccard 0.609 mean / 0.695 best vs floor 0.848
vendor/fsot/ The six FSOT GitHub repos (Lean hub is the math authority)
scripts/dump_baseline.py Writes artifacts/baseline_freeze.json
scripts/dump_wavegazer.py Writes artifacts/wavegazer_vs_unet.json
scripts/compare_synthetic.py Named synthetic cell split: train U-Net, run Wavegazer

Machine

This tree was stood up on:

  • Windows, Python 3.11
  • NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 (12 GB, sm_120)
  • PyTorch 2.9.1+cu128 (Blackwell needs CUDA 12.8+ wheels)

Setup

cd "C:\Users\damia\Desktop\Wavegazer net"
python -m venv .venv
.\.venv\Scripts\python.exe -m pip install --upgrade pip
.\.venv\Scripts\python.exe -m pip install torch==2.9.1+cu128 torchvision --index-url https://download.pytorch.org/whl/cu128
.\.venv\Scripts\python.exe -m pip install numpy pytest

Check the baseline

.\.venv\Scripts\python.exe -m pytest -q
.\.venv\Scripts\python.exe scripts\dump_baseline.py
.\.venv\Scripts\python.exe scripts\dump_wavegazer.py
.\.venv\Scripts\python.exe scripts\render_schematic.py
.\.venv\Scripts\python.exe scripts\compare_synthetic.py
.\.venv\Scripts\python.exe scripts\compare_biohub.py
.\.venv\Scripts\python.exe scripts\compare_biohub_peaks.py
.\.venv\Scripts\python.exe scripts\compare_biohub_3d.py
.\.venv\Scripts\python.exe scripts\compare_biohub_track.py

dump_baseline.py records parameter counts, feature-map shapes, a dummy (untrained) forward, and GPU identity. Dummy Dice is not a performance claim. compare_synthetic.py is the first named split.

Data on this machine

The Kaggle Biohub dump is on D:, not the mystery USB:

D:\Kaggle_Biohub_Data\train — 199 zarr+geff pairs, ~175 GB.

scripts/compare_biohub.py scores a 2D Z-max + disk-around-centroid proxy (not the official track metric). Use WavegazerNet(..., sparse=True) there.

Next

If a residual on a named split is bad, do not add conv weights — change the (D_{\mathrm{eff}}) ladder in src/wavegazer/fsot_routes.py. Detect gate is live (compare_biohub_peaks.py): Wavegazer F1 0.164 vs φ-DoG 0.139 @ 7 µm on 16 volumes. Next: raise recall without dumping precision, then a trained U-Net peak head on the same frames.

About

Wavegazer Net: FSOT visual equivalent of U-Net. Zero trainable weights. Cell detect @ 7 µm. Not FlowNet (optical flow).

Topics

Resources

Stars

0 stars

Watchers

0 watching

Forks

Releases

Packages

Contributors

Languages