forked from bitcoin/bitcoin
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
backport: Merge bitcoin#28144, 26705, 27832, 28101, 28028 #7078
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Draft
vijaydasmp
wants to merge
4
commits into
dashpay:develop
Choose a base branch
from
vijaydasmp:Jan_2026_3
base: develop
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+108
−96
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
✅ No Merge Conflicts DetectedThis PR currently has no conflicts with other open PRs. |
5fd3024 to
f63513a
Compare
7b8e611 to
9ce7567
Compare
|
This pull request has conflicts, please rebase. |
9ce7567 to
d7ec7c1
Compare
80472e8 to
e003f51
Compare
…ching.py 8a20f76 test: drop duplicate getaddrs from p2p_getaddr_caching (Martin Zumsande) feb0096 test: fix intermittent failure in p2p_getaddr_caching (Martin Zumsande) Pull request description: Fixes bitcoin#28133 In the consistency check, it's not enough to check that our address/port is unique, only the combination of source and target must be unique. Otherwise, the OS may reuse ports for connections to different `-addrbind`, which was happening in the failed runs. While at it, the second commit cleans up duplicate `getaddr` messages in `p2p_getaddr_caching.py` that do nothing but generate `Ignoring repeated "getaddr"` log messages (and cleans up some whitespace the python linter complains about). ACKs for top commit: vasild: ACK 8a20f76 Tree-SHA512: eabe4727d7887f729074076f6333a918bba8cb34b8e3baaa83f167b441b0daa24f7c4824abcf03a9538a2ef14b2d826ff19aeffcb93a6c20735253a9678aac9c
…it` in headers and force to check all headers b0e9169 clang-tidy: Force to check all headers (Hennadii Stepanov) 96ee992 clang-tidy: Fix `modernize-use-default-member-init` in headers (Hennadii Stepanov) Pull request description: This PR: - fixes the only [remained](bitcoin#26705 (comment)) check in headers, i.e., `modernize-use-default-member-init` - forces `clang-tidy` check all headers Closes bitcoin#26703. ACKs for top commit: MarcoFalke: review ACK b0e9169 🍹 Tree-SHA512: 4d33fe873094914541ae81968cdb4e7a7a01b3fdd4f25bc6daa8a53f45dab80565a5b3607ddc338f122369ca5a0a2d0d09c8e78cabe1beb6bd50c115bc5c5210
…ize=2 tests faafc35 doc: Clarify that -datacarriersize applies to the full raw scriptPubKey, not the data push (MarcoFalke) 55550e7 test: Add -datacarriersize=2 tests (MarcoFalke) Pull request description: Clarify with a test that `-datacarriersize` applies to the serialized size of the scriptPubKey, not the size of the pushed data. So for example, * `-datacarriersize=2` will reject a `raw(6a01aa)`, even though only one byte is pushed * `-datacarriersize=0` (or `-datacarrier=0`) will reject a `raw(6a)`, even though no byte is pushed * `-datacarriersize=0` (or `-datacarrier=0`) will reject a `raw(6a00)`, even though zero bytes are pushed ACKs for top commit: ajtowns: ACK faafc35 instagibbs: ACK bitcoin@faafc35 Tree-SHA512: f01ace02798f596ac2a02461e9f2a6ef91b3b37c976ea0b3bc860e2d3efb0ace0fd8b779dd18249cee7f84ebbe5fd21d8506afd3a15edadc00b843ff3b4aacc7
…ify that a default port is used 9a84200 doc, refactor: Changing -torcontrol help to specify that a default port is used (kevkevin) Pull request description: Right now when we get the help for -torcontrol it says that there is a default ip and port we dont specify if there is a specified ip that we would also use port 9051 as default Also I create a new const instead of using 9051 directly in the function linking this PR because this was discussed here bitcoin#28018 ACKs for top commit: jonatack: re-ACK 9a84200 achow101: ACK 9a84200 MarnixCroes: utACK 9a84200 kristapsk: utACK 9a84200 Tree-SHA512: 21d9e65f3c280a2853a9cf60d4e93e8d72caccea106206d1862c19535bde7ea6ada7f55e6ea19a1fc0f59dbe791ec6fc4084fdbe7fa6d6991fa89c62070db637
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Bitcoin backports