Skip to content

fix(evals): bind paid artifacts and preserve command explanations - #189

Merged
vriesd merged 11 commits into
mainfrom
fix/confirmed-pass-explanation
Oct 9, 2026
Merged

vriesd merged 11 commits into
mainfrom
fix/confirmed-pass-explanation

Conversation

@vriesd

@vriesd vriesd commented Oct 9, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

A truthful command handoff such as “node scripts/verify.mjs passed on Linux, confirming null handling and string trimming” was rejected because its explanation stayed inside the status field. The parser now requires every coordinated explanation phrase to describe a recognized processing operation. Unknown nouns, status and authority assertions stay unsupported. Command-owned status, integrity, host and authority constraints remain operative. Native evidence requirements remain unchanged.

A separate launch-mask mistake produced different archive bytes despite identical contents. The runner now accepts a strict paired expected tarball and full-manifest hash and checks the actual packed artifact before cache installation, credential copying, model probes or workflow calls. Malformed, repeated or partial options fail before building. Both absent options preserve existing behavior. Contributor documentation explains the flags and private-log handling.

Validation passes on clean head 3ce0a081. Full preflight passes 3,537 tests with 20 existing skips and zero failures. Independent review passes 112 parser controls, including native-proof mutations, and five actual-archive admission controls. Wrong raw bytes with identical contents reserve no calls. The matching approved archive reaches only an offline fake probe in these tests. Exact-head comment audit passes.

Canonical packing with the reviewed mask reproduces the approved 9.6.0 tarball and full unpacked manifest. Product bytes, policy, catalog, plan, case instructions, sampling, models and native proof checking remain unchanged. Original stopped reports and archives remain immutable and receive no qualification credit. A fresh full qualification and genuine conditional canary are required before release.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Oct 9, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-10-09T18:21:36.377731Z 05e9f6d PR opened
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 05e9f6de2c

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread evals/delivery-presentation.ts
@vriesd
vriesd merged commit b1cdd64 into main Oct 9, 2026
7 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants