docs: add missing sections to ES/JA/RU/ZH README variants (V4-16) - #9
Merged
Conversation
Restore maintained-variant parity with the canonical English README (language parity report docs/language-parity-report.WORKSTATION-LG.20260730.json in ellmos-development-system flagged heading/fence/link drift for all four variants). Each of the four variants lacked the Start Here, Architecture & Data Flow (mermaid) and Discovery Context sections plus the tests and llms.txt badges. Added as faithful translations following the verified German variant's conventions (translated mermaid node labels, search phrases kept in English, localized llms.txt badge, table row pointing to the English guide). Structural parity after the change (fence-aware measurement): 16/16 real heading levels and identical fenced code blocks for all five variants; link targets identical except the same by-design localizations the verified German variant already has (switcher cross-links, localized llms.txt badge). Handoff KIMI-V4-WORKSTATION-LG-20260731-01. Verification: 41 passed (pytest) + 45 passed (node --test); git diff --check clean; natural-language semantics remain not-machine-proven.
|
Welcome! Thanks for your first pull request in this repository. A maintainer will review it soon. Please make sure:
Thanks for contributing! |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Kontext
Handoff
KIMI-V4-WORKSTATION-LG-20260731-01, Arbeitspaket V4-16 (Sprachparität). Der Language-Parity-Report (docs/language-parity-report.WORKSTATION-LG.20260730.json, ellmos-development-system) meldete für die Varianten ES/JA/RU/ZH-Hans jeheading-structure-drift,fenced-code-drift,link-target-drift. Die DE-Variante ist bereits paritätisch (nur by-design-Lokalisierungen).Befund (unabhängig nachgemessen, fence-bereinigt)
Allen vier Varianten fehlten gegenüber der englischen Leitfassung dieselben drei Sektionen und zwei Badges:
## Start Here(Tabelle + NOTE-Block mit zweillms.txt-Links)## Architecture & Data Flow(Mermaid-Diagramm)## Discovery Context(Suchphrasen)tests-41 Python | 45 Nodeundllms.txtÄnderung (4 Dateien, +164)
Fehlende Sektionen/Badges als getreue Übersetzungen ergänzt — nach den Konventionen der bereits verifizierten deutschen Variante: übersetzte Mermaid-Knotentexte, Suchphrasen bewusst englisch belassen, lokalisiertes
llms.txt-Badge (disponible/利用可能/доступен/可用), Tabellenzeile verweist auf die englische Leitfassung. Kein bestehender Inhalt geändert.Verifikation
python -m pytest -q→ 41 passednode --test web_publisher/tests/publisher.test.mjs→ 45 passed (deckt sich mit den Badge-Angaben)git diff --check→ sauberNonclaims
Natürlichsprachliche Semantik bleibt
not-machine-proven(Contract-Vorbehalt); Übersetzungen folgen der DE-Konvention, wurden aber nicht von Muttersprachlern geprüft. Keine Änderung an der EN-Leitfassung oder der DE-Variante. Kein Merge durch den Ersteller — Abnahme/Merge obliegt unabhängiger Prüfung bzw. User-Entscheidung.