feat(devices): add remote platform erase support by nmgaston · Pull Request #3206 · device-management-toolkit/sample-web-ui

nmgaston · 2026-03-18T00:13:02Z

PR Checklist

Unit Tests have been added for new changes
API tests have been updated if applicable
All commented code has been removed
If you've added a dependency, you've ensured license is compatible with Apache 2.0 and clearly outlined the added dependency.

What are you changing?

Adds a Remote Platform Erase feature to the device detail view, allowing users to remotely wipe a managed AMT device.

New RemotePlatformEraseComponent (src/app/devices/remote-platform-erase/) with:
- Detection and display of whether the device supports remote platform erase
- Toggle to enable/disable the platformEraseEnabled AMT feature via the existing AMT features API
- Per-capability checkboxes (Secure Erase of All SSDs, TPM Clear, Restore BIOS to EOM State, Unconfigure Intel CSME Firmware) driven by a bitmask parsed from rpeCaps
- Selecting "Unconfigure Intel CSME Firmware" deselects and disables all other options, as it performs a full AMT unprovision and cannot be combined with other operations
- Confirmation dialog (reusing AreYouSureDialogComponent) before initiating an erase
- Warning banners and error snackbar notifications for destructive/failed operations
- Loading state via mat-progress-bar
DevicesService: adds sendRemotePlatformErase(deviceId, eraseMask) calling POST /api/v1/amt/remoteErase/:deviceId; renames enableRPE → platformEraseEnabled in the AMT features request body to align with the updated MPS API (see associated PRs)
DeviceDetailComponent: adds "Remote Platform Erase" nav item (phonelink_erase icon) and routes to the new component
models.ts: updates AMTFeaturesResponse/AMTFeaturesRequest types to reflect the renamed field and new response properties
i18n: adds translation keys for all UI strings across all 12 supported locales
Cypress E2E tests covering: not-supported state, feature enabled/disabled states, toggle on/off with API assertion, confirm/cancel erase dialog, and error snackbar on API failure

Anything the reviewer should know when reviewing this PR?

eraseMask is a bitmask integer; the constants and bit definitions live in remote-platform-erase.constants.ts.
This PR should be merged alongside or after device-management-toolkit/mps#2407 and device-management-toolkit/console#846, which adds the corresponding backend support.

Associated PRs

rsdmike · 2026-04-17T20:37:00Z

Thanks for doing this! Few things i see:

There are some errors showig on the device detail page:

_effect-chunk2.mjs:2601 ERROR Error: Cannot find control with name: 'enablePlatformErase'
    at _throwError (forms.mjs:1658:9)
    at setUpControl (forms.mjs:1524:19)
  ...

Remote Platform Erase is allowing me to click it device details page, but my device doesnt support it.
icon on menu should probably be computer cancel instead of mobile cancel
I think since the checkbox is already on amt device info, if its enabled no need to show the checkbox here:

I think need to move this:

in to one box, hidden until the feature is enabled. If its enabled, then should show this capabilites to select. the call to action button (initiate) should be up in the top right of the RPE box to follow the design pattern of KVM, SOL, Audit Log, etc...

…e is set to All

…ypted

madhavilosetty-intel · 2026-07-22T23:54:42Z

+      unconfigureCSME: caps.some((c, i) => c.key === 'csmeUnconfigure' && this.eraseCapsArray.at(i)?.value === true)
+    }
+    if (req.secureEraseAllSSDs && this.isSsdEncrypted()) {
+      req.ssdPassword = this.ssdPasswordControl.value ?? ''


I don't see this field on MPS ssdPassword , instead powerType is ignored in UI

madhavilosetty-intel · 2026-07-23T21:14:35Z

+      )
+      .subscribe({
+        next: () => {
+          if (req.unconfigureCSME) {


After a successful CSME erase, sendDeactivate() (devices.service.ts:373) behaves differently by deployment:

Cloud/MPS: calls DELETE /api/v1/amt/deactivate/:guid even though ConfigurationDataRese has already scheduled AMT unprovisioning on the next boot (DeviceAction.ts:257). Could this immediate deactivation interrupt the pending erase process?

Console/Enterprise: calls DELETE /api/v1/devices/:guid, which removes the device from Console inventory but does not deactivate AMT — Console has no amt/deactivate route, so the branch is necessary, but the operation isn't equivalent. If the device never reboots or the erase fails, it could become untracked.

Additional concerns:

Errors from sendDeactivate() are ignored (catchError(() => EMPTY), line 341), so the success snackbar fires and the user is navigated to /devices even when the call fails.

The confirmation dialog does not mention that the device may be removed from Console inventory.

Could we confirm the intended behavior for both deployment types? If Console record deletion is expected, should the confirmation dialog explicitly state that the device will be removed from inventory?

@nmgaston @madhavilosetty-intel just making sure, we do not want to enable the “Unconfigure CSME” option at this time. If it is currently enabled or available, please disable it, as using this option could make the device unmanageable through Console or MPS.

@graikhel-intel It is currently hidden in the UI. I'll make some of the obvious fixes regarding that option, but will leave most of it for when/if we enable that option.

great, thanks!

madhavilosetty-intel · 2026-07-23T21:48:08Z

+      map((features) => {
+        const stream = this.getOrCreateFeaturesStream(guid)
+        const current = stream.value
+        const merged = current === null ? features : { ...features, rpe: current.rpe }


It looks like the cached rpe value overrides the latest server value on every fetch after the first:

{ ...features, rpe: current.rpe }
The UI always replaces the latest rpe value from the server with the old cached value. While, ocr uses the latest server value, so the two settings behave differently.

I remember there was a problem with a stale GET request after a POST that was overwriting the user's choice for RPE. This helped fix that for RPE anyways. Maybe it should be done for all features.

nmgaston force-pushed the remotePlatformErase branch from c7091b5 to cf0fa97 Compare March 18, 2026 00:17

nmgaston commented Mar 18, 2026

View reviewed changes

Comment thread src/assets/i18n/ar.json

nmgaston force-pushed the remotePlatformErase branch 12 times, most recently from 58e08ae to 9afb33d Compare March 23, 2026 18:39

nmgaston force-pushed the remotePlatformErase branch 7 times, most recently from bb235c9 to c88557f Compare April 8, 2026 20:41

nmgaston mentioned this pull request Apr 8, 2026

feat(devices): add remote platform erase support device-management-toolkit/console#846

Open

nmgaston force-pushed the remotePlatformErase branch 3 times, most recently from 93f60f7 to f0dfe42 Compare April 16, 2026 22:26

This was linked to issues Apr 16, 2026

Add support for Remote Platform Erase in Console device-management-toolkit/console#781

Open

Add support for Remote Platform Erase in MPS device-management-toolkit/mps#915

Open

nmgaston force-pushed the remotePlatformErase branch 2 times, most recently from 6b8b3f0 to 0db2b32 Compare April 17, 2026 01:54

nmgaston force-pushed the remotePlatformErase branch from 1d2fe9f to 2390145 Compare June 24, 2026 20:11

fix: build after merge

2390145

nmgaston force-pushed the remotePlatformErase branch 2 times, most recently from 5303a5e to b65818b Compare June 26, 2026 21:43

nmgaston added 5 commits June 26, 2026 14:48

chore(docker): update Dockerfile

7210e13

revert(docker): revert Dockerfile update

b65818b

feat: add user consent mode for CCM mode and when ACM UserConsent mod…

9ba37cd

…e is set to All

fix: issue with keeping RPE state between tabs in cloud

54c1fc4

Merge branch 'main' into remotePlatformErase

0f5100d

nmgaston force-pushed the remotePlatformErase branch 2 times, most recently from fa9c9e7 to 67d7624 Compare July 1, 2026 19:32

style: UI changes from review

67d7624

nmgaston force-pushed the remotePlatformErase branch 2 times, most recently from 25c02d3 to 9b6efa3 Compare July 1, 2026 22:56

nmgaston added 2 commits July 1, 2026 16:01

style: UI changes from review

9b6efa3

Merge branch 'main' into remotePlatformErase

e51bdf4

nmgaston requested review from DevipriyaS17 and nbmaiti July 13, 2026 19:23

nmgaston added 2 commits July 14, 2026 16:47

feat: add 32 byte limit for Pyrite drive when wiping SSD that is encr…

f1e2174

…ypted

chore: rebase

fac4bbb

nmgaston force-pushed the remotePlatformErase branch from 871d2e1 to 2c0484a Compare July 15, 2026 17:24

chore: fix lint issue

2c0484a

madhavilosetty-intel reviewed Jul 22, 2026

View reviewed changes

Comment thread src/app/devices/remote-platform-erase/remote-platform-erase.component.ts Outdated

madhavilosetty-intel reviewed Jul 22, 2026

View reviewed changes

Comment thread src/app/devices/devices.service.ts Outdated

madhavilosetty-intel reviewed Jul 22, 2026

View reviewed changes

madhavilosetty-intel reviewed Jul 23, 2026

View reviewed changes

Comment thread src/app/devices/devices.service.ts Outdated

madhavilosetty-intel reviewed Jul 23, 2026

View reviewed changes

nmgaston added 2 commits July 23, 2026 16:53

fix: review comments

e565265

Merge branch 'main' into remotePlatformErase

24f7eb2

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Uh oh!

feat(devices): add remote platform erase support#3206

feat(devices): add remote platform erase support#3206
nmgaston wants to merge 34 commits into
mainfrom
remotePlatformErase

nmgaston commented Mar 18, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

rsdmike commented Apr 17, 2026

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

madhavilosetty-intel Jul 22, 2026

Uh oh!

madhavilosetty-intel Jul 23, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

graikhel-intel Jul 23, 2026

Uh oh!

nmgaston Jul 23, 2026

Uh oh!

graikhel-intel Jul 23, 2026

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

madhavilosetty-intel Jul 23, 2026

Uh oh!

nmgaston Jul 23, 2026

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

4 participants

Uh oh!

Conversation

nmgaston commented Mar 18, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

PR Checklist

What are you changing?

Anything the reviewer should know when reviewing this PR?

Associated PRs

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

rsdmike commented Apr 17, 2026

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

madhavilosetty-intel Jul 22, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

madhavilosetty-intel Jul 23, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

graikhel-intel Jul 23, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

nmgaston Jul 23, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

graikhel-intel Jul 23, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

madhavilosetty-intel Jul 23, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

nmgaston Jul 23, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

4 participants

nmgaston commented Mar 18, 2026 •

edited

Loading

madhavilosetty-intel Jul 23, 2026 •

edited

Loading