Draft
Improve OTLP observability example: add usings, reorder steps, refresh versions#55623
Conversation
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Copilot wasn't able to review any files in this pull request.
💡 Add a code-review agent skill for context-aware, tailored reviews. Learn more in the docs.
Co-authored-by: adegeo <67293991+adegeo@users.noreply.github.com>
… versions and port guidance Co-authored-by: adegeo <67293991+adegeo@users.noreply.github.com>
Copilot
AI
changed the title
[WIP] Update OTEL article with additional coding information
Improve OTLP observability example: add usings, reorder steps, refresh versions
Aug 20, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The OTLP/Aspire Dashboard example article required trial and error to follow: it omitted
usingdirectives, had readers ping-pong between later and earlier insertion points inProgram.cs, referenced an outdated package version, and hardcoded a port that doesn't match whatdotnet runactually outputs.Article structure
Snippet_Usingsmarker inProgram.csbuilder.Build();) now come before the API endpoint step (which comes afterbuilder.Build();), so readers no longer jump backward to insert earlier codeContent fixes
1.9.0to1.17.0, matching the sample.csprojcurl -k http://localhost:7275example with guidance to read the actual listening port from thedotnet runconsole output, since it can differ per environmentInternal previews