Skip to content

🧪 [Add edge case tests for skills Discover function] - #38

Open
eshanized wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
improve-discover-tests-13885243555074766371
Open

🧪 [Add edge case tests for skills Discover function]#38
eshanized wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
improve-discover-tests-13885243555074766371

Conversation

@eshanized

@eshanized eshanized commented Aug 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

🎯 What: The testing gap addressed
The Discover function in internal/integrations/skills/discovery.go handles missing directories or invalid paths (like passing files instead of directories) but lacked tests to verify it returns a graceful empty response without panicking.

📊 Coverage: What scenarios are now tested

  • Added TestDiscover_MissingSkillsSubdirectories to test cases where the base or project directories exist but the inner skills/.m31a/skills directories do not.
  • Added TestDiscover_FileAsDirectory to test cases where paths point to regular files instead of expected directories.

Result: The improvement in test coverage
The test coverage for edge conditions in Discover is improved, ensuring robustness and safety against filesystem variations.


PR created automatically by Jules for task 13885243555074766371 started by @eshanized


Summary by cubic

Added edge-case tests for the Discover function to ensure it handles missing skills subdirectories and file paths passed instead of directories. Confirms it returns an empty result without panicking.

Written for commit 6dcf6e2. Summary will update on new commits.

Review in cubic

Co-authored-by: eshanized <148610067+eshanized@users.noreply.github.com>
@google-labs-jules

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

@eshanized
eshanized marked this pull request as ready for review August 9, 2026 21:30

@cubic-dev-ai cubic-dev-ai Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No issues found across 1 file

Re-trigger cubic

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant