test(plugins): add Ginkgo test suite for /pkg/csi/plugins/register.go#5517
test(plugins): add Ginkgo test suite for /pkg/csi/plugins/register.go#5517adity1raut wants to merge 3 commits intofluid-cloudnative:masterfrom
Conversation
Signed-off-by: adity1raut <araut7798@gmail.com>
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
Hi @adity1raut. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a fluid-cloudnative member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #5517 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 61.29% 61.35% +0.05%
==========================================
Files 444 444
Lines 30540 30540
==========================================
+ Hits 18721 18739 +18
+ Misses 10276 10257 -19
- Partials 1543 1544 +1 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
|
/gemini review |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request adds a Ginkgo test suite for pkg/csi/plugins/register.go. The changes are a good step towards improving test coverage. I've found a few issues: a package naming inconsistency that will cause a build failure, unnecessary use of reflection in a test helper, and a test case that lacks assertions. Addressing these points will improve the quality and correctness of the new tests.
pkg/csi/plugins/register_test.go
Outdated
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This function uses reflection to set fields that are actually exported. This makes the code unnecessarily complex and less performant. It can be simplified by using a struct literal for initialization.
// createTestRunningContext creates a RunningContext for testing
func createTestRunningContext(nodeID, endpoint, kubeletConfigPath string) config.RunningContext {
return config.RunningContext{
Config: config.Config{
NodeId: nodeID,
Endpoint: endpoint,
KubeletConfigPath: kubeletConfigPath,
},
}
}
pkg/csi/plugins/register_test.go
Outdated
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This test case lacks assertions. It only prints to GinkgoWriter, which doesn't verify any behavior. Based on the setup, getNodeAuthorizedClientFromKubeletConfig should succeed. You should add assertions to confirm that no error is returned and a client is created.
It("should process the file and return a client", func() {
// Note: This test will not fail when calling InitNodeAuthorizedClient
// because it does not require a connection to the Kubernetes API server to create a client.
client, err := getNodeAuthorizedClientFromKubeletConfig(kubeletConfigPath)
Expect(err).NotTo(HaveOccurred())
Expect(client).NotTo(BeNil())
})
cheyang
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@adity1raut pls resolve the comments by gemini first.
|
@cheyang I am currently work on that |
…orts Signed-off-by: adity1raut <araut7798@gmail.com>
|
|
@cheyang The line errors are not showing on my side. How should I approach this? |



Ⅰ. Describe what this PR does
Ⅱ. Does this pull request fix one issue?
part of #5407
Ⅲ. List the added test cases (unit test/integration test) if any, please explain if no tests are needed.
Ⅳ. Describe how to verify it
Ⅴ. Special notes for reviews