AI in Metascience: publish the provisional programme - #876
Merged
Conversation
Replaces the "programme coming in early September" placeholder with the sessions and the talks in each, in running order. No clock times and no abstracts: presenter availability was never collected, so every slot is still being confirmed with the authors. One reply moves everything after it in its session, and a day plus morning or afternoon is what a reader in another time zone needs in order to decide. Times and abstracts follow on 10 September. The block between the PROGRAMME markers is generated by build/public_programme.py in the submission-review repo, which reads the same submission records the committee decided on. Rerun it to refresh the block. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Contributor
|
👍 All image files/references (if any) are in webp format, in line with our policy. |
Contributor
📝 Spell Check ResultsFound 7 potential spelling issue(s) when checking 6 changed file(s): 📄
|
| Line | Issue |
|---|---|
| 599 | Harware ==> Hardware |
| 599 | nWe ==> new |
| 599 | nIn ==> inn, min, bin, nine |
| 599 | nWe ==> new |
| 599 | nWe ==> new |
| 599 | nWe ==> new |
| 599 | nWe ==> new |
ℹ️ How to address these issues:
- Fix the typo: If it's a genuine typo, please correct it.
- Add to whitelist: If it's a valid word (e.g., a name, technical term), add it to
.codespell-ignore.txt - False positive: If this is a false positive, please report it in the PR comments.
🤖 This check was performed by codespell
…ading Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Contributor
Author
|
✅ Staging Deployment Status This PR has been successfully deployed to staging as part of an aggregated deployment. Deployed at: 2026-09-11 13:54:37 UTC The staging site shows the combined state of all compatible open PRs. |
Every talk row opens its abstract in a modal, so the page carries the full content rather than a list of titles. The abstracts come from the same submission records the committee decided on. Layout, after a design pass: - Session headings now outweigh talk titles, so the page can be read by session rather than talk by talk. - Vertical rhythm separates day, half-day and session instead of running them together. - A chevron on each row says it opens something; hovering no longer shifts the text sideways. - Rows are at least 44px tall, the half-day label meets contrast, and a long abstract scrolls inside the dialog instead of running off a phone screen. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…mitted ones Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…at TalTech Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…Tuesday Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…ternoon Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
richarddushime
approved these changes
Sep 1, 2026
richarddushime
left a comment
richarddushime
left a comment
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Aprouving checks so that you can merge it anytime
…iew and programme The generated programme block is styled with CSS only, so the build script in the submission-review repo needs no change. Talk titles use the site link colour to show they open the abstract. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01CgrBfhmD8tnz31EGkzbmMR
Almarzouq, Helmy and Yamada rewrote their abstracts after the committee asked for more detail; Helmy's talk is retitled "The FOCUS Framework: Ten Simple Rules...". Peder Isager is at Oslo New University College. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Two late submissions from TU Eindhoven, accepted into one shared 20-minute slot opening "Evaluating science, and its evaluators". Mesquida presents on behalf of both, so the session gains a talk and nobody else moves. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Sahu, Kruzenshtern and Elton rewrote their abstracts; Elton's talk is now "...and experiments with AI for forensic metascience", covering the forensic work he started in August. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Ineichen sent a title and abstract aimed at non-specialists, and the symposium description now follows it. Yamada's talk runs 20 minutes. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Ineichen lectures across its current slot, so the session keeps its place in Tuesday morning under a visible "timing to be confirmed" label rather than implying a time that is not settled. Also: Sawyer's revised abstract, Mesquida presenting alone after all, and the symposium's own title, which a stale line in the builder had been overwriting with the committee's paraphrase. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…med time Ineichen teaches from 11:00 on the 29th, so the symposium takes the 09:30 slot and Reproducing the record moves to the later half of the morning. The timing caveat comes off. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The page said times would go up on 10 September, which is today, and the last few speakers have not confirmed their slots. It now says times follow when they have, with no date to miss. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
His talk on machine-readable standards for FAIR data and code takes the last slot in "Conditions for legitimate adoption", which is where the argument belongs: it is the precondition for the open infrastructure the rest of the session is about. The provocation moves twenty minutes later and the day still closes well inside the advertised window. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Facts strip and day cards replace the definition list and the day paragraphs; the day cards jump to their programme section. A sticky day switcher tracks the day in view. Sessions are cards with a per-day accent, talk rows show a duration pill and an Abstract link, and the abstract pop-up names the day and session. A second Register prompt follows the programme. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01XibpjgXwDqUbWScqG4Leut
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Adds the programme to
/ai-metascience/, replacing the "full programme will be available here in early September" placeholder.Ready to merge. Up to date with
main, and the only file it touches iscontent/ai-metascience/index.md.What is on the page
Day, half-day, session, talk title, speaker, for 36 talks and workshops across three days. Clicking a talk opens its abstract in a modal.
What is deliberately not on it
No clock times. Presenter availability was never collected, so every slot was inferred from a submitted time zone and confirmed with the author one at a time. 32 of 37 have now confirmed, but four moves have not yet gone out, so the times are not safe to print. The page says times follow when the last speakers confirm, with no date attached: the earlier promise of 10 September has been dropped rather than missed.
Nothing committee-only appears: no reviewer comments, no revision requests, no decline reasons, no withdrawn speaker.
How the block is maintained
Everything between
<!-- PROGRAMME:START -->and<!-- PROGRAMME:END -->is generated bybuild/public_programme.pyin the (private) submission-review repo, from the same records the committee decided on. It refuses to build unless every accepted submission is either in the running order, withdrawn, merged into another talk, or explicitly marked unplaced, so a talk cannot fall off the page unnoticed. Rerunning it replaces the block in place.Everything outside the markers — the CSS, the section intro, the registration and code-of-conduct sections — is hand-written and safe to edit here.
Notes for a reviewer
🤖 Generated with Claude Code