-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.4k
[Early POC] Expose the extension launch provider in the Node SDK #2618
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Draft
jruales
wants to merge
1
commit into
main
Choose a base branch
from
jruales/node-extension-launch-provider
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+119
−1
Draft
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Cross-SDK consistency:
onExtensionLaunch/ extension launch provider is Node.js-onlyThis PR wires up a client-level, high-level API for the extension launch provider feature in the Node.js SDK (
CopilotClientOptions.onExtensionLaunch,CopilotClient.supportsExtensionLaunchProvider, and automaticregisterExtensionLaunchProviderregistration duringstart()).The generated RPC primitives (
ExtensionLaunchProfile,ExtensionLaunchProviderResolveRequest/Result,registerExtensionLaunchProvider) already exist in every generated layer (Go, Python, .NET, Java, Rust), since those are produced from the shared CLI schema. However, only Rust also has a matching high-level convenience API (ClientOptions::with_extension_launch_providerinrust/src/lib.rs/rust/src/extension_launch_provider.rs). Go, Python, .NET, and Java currently expose only the low-level generated RPC method/types and have no ergonomic client option to register a launch provider or asupports_extension_launch_provider-equivalent capability flag.Suggestion: consider adding the equivalent high-level wiring to Go, Python, .NET, and Java (following each language's naming convention, e.g.
with_extension_launch_providerin Python,WithExtensionLaunchProvider/SupportsExtensionLaunchProviderin Go/.NET,onExtensionLaunch/supportsExtensionLaunchProviderin Java) in a follow-up PR, so this experimental feature reaches parity across SDKs before it graduates from@experimental.