Skip to content

Add interview-first sparkle-pills chat chaining and deterministic plan response - #2431

Open
groupthinking with Codex wants to merge 3 commits into
mainfrom
codex/agent-login-system
Open

groupthinking with Codex wants to merge 3 commits into
mainfrom
codex/agent-login-system

Conversation

@Codex

@Codex Codex AI commented Oct 15, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Canonical issue

Linked by system automation.

Outcome

This PR adds an interview-first path for “sparkle pills” requests so the system asks clarifying questions before proposing a workflow. When required answers are provided, it returns a deterministic, action-oriented plan without invoking model providers.

Scope

  • Included:
  • Sparkle intent gate: detects sparkle-pill requests in chat input and routes them through a dedicated chaining contract.
  • Interview-first response: returns requiresInterview: true plus targeted clarifying questions when required fields are missing.
  • Deterministic plan response: returns provider: "sparkle-pills-planner" and a structured operational plan once interview fields are complete.
  • Contract documentation: adds CHAINING.md with request/response schema and runtime behavior.
  • Focused API coverage: adds tests for both interview-first and completed-interview plan paths.
  • Example snippet:
{
  "query": "Build me a system for using sparkle pills",
  "sparkleInterview": {
    "useCase": "Manage weekday focus sessions",
    "trigger": "Start each weekday at 08:30",
    "tools": ["Google Calendar", "Slack"],
    "constraints": "No notifications after 21:00",
    "successSignal": "5 sessions completed per week"
  }
}
  • Explicitly excluded:
  • Changes to non-sparkle chat routing behavior.
  • Any new external integrations, deployment workflows, or dependency updates.

Risk

  • Risk level: low
  • Failure mode:
    Sparkle detection could match unintended prompts and return interview payloads instead of normal chat output.
  • Rollback:
    Revert the sparkle branch in apps/web/src/app/api/chat/route.ts and remove apps/web/src/lib/sparkle-pills.ts.

Verification

List exact automated and manual checks, tied to the current head SHA.

  • Focused tests
  • Required CI
  • Review threads resolved

Production evidence

Not applicable for production behavior claims in this PR description; change is API-path scoped and documented by route contract (CHAINING.md).

Agent handoff

  • One canonical issue is linked
  • No competing PR implements the same issue
  • Acceptance criteria are satisfied
  • Required checks pass on the current head
  • Human decision is requested only for product, security, irreversible infrastructure, or production approval

Security dependency evidence

  • Advisory: Not applicable (no advisory-driven dependency change)
  • Package and versions: Not applicable
  • Validation: Not applicable
  • Rollback: Not applicable

@vercel

vercel Bot commented Oct 15, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated
v0-uvai Ready Ready Preview, v0 Oct 15, 2026 7:04am UTC

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Oct 15, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Important

Review skipped

Bot user detected.

To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration
  • Configuration used: Repository: groupthinking/EventRelay/.coderabbit.yaml
  • Review profile: ASSERTIVE
  • Plan: Advanced
  • Run ID: 4b467169-7e12-4742-891e-19a7d8d4aba1

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review
  • Autofix · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

Co-authored-by: groupthinking <154503486+groupthinking@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: groupthinking <154503486+groupthinking@users.noreply.github.com>
@Codex Codex AI changed the title [WIP] Build a system for using sparkle pills Add interview-first sparkle-pills chat chaining and deterministic plan response Oct 15, 2026
@Codex
Codex AI requested a review from groupthinking October 15, 2026 07:04
@Codex Codex AI linked an issue Oct 15, 2026 that may be closed by this pull request
1 task done
@groupthinking
groupthinking marked this pull request as ready for review October 15, 2026 08:37
Copilot AI balanced review requested due to automatic review settings October 15, 2026 08:37
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🔍 PR Validation

⚠️ PR title should follow conventional commits format

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🟡 Changes recommended

Client integration is incomplete, planning ignores video grounding, and required tools can be silently discarded.

3 open findings
What changed in this PR

Adds an interview-first sparkle-pills branch to UVAI’s chat API, returning a deterministic plan without model calls once required answers are supplied.

Changes:

  • Detect sparkle intent and request interview answers.
  • Generate plans from completed interviews.
  • Document the API contract and add focused route tests.
File Description
CHAINING.md Documents interview and plan payloads.
apps/​web/​src/​lib/​sparkle-pills.ts Implements detection, answer parsing, and planning.
apps/​web/​src/​app/​api/​chat/​route.ts Routes sparkle requests to the new handler.
apps/​web/​src/​app/​api/​__tests__/​chat-sparkle-pills-route.test.ts Covers interview and completed-plan responses.

🧠 Review effort: Balanced


💡 Configure MCP servers for context-aware, tailored reviews. Learn more in the docs.

Comment on lines +140 to +143
const sparkleResponse = resolveSparklePillsResponse({
query: typeof query === 'string' ? query : String(query),
sparkleInterview: body.sparkleInterview,
});
Comment on lines +144 to +145
if (sparkleResponse) {
return NextResponse.json(sparkleResponse);
Comment on lines +19 to +20
.filter((entry) => entry.length > 0)
.slice(0, 8);

This branch was successfully deployed

1 active deployment
Preview — fc4d7047 Deployed Oct 15, 2026 by vercel[bot]
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Agent]

3 participants