Open
Conversation
Member
Author
|
Pasting @AgraVator's comment here from #12640 (comment): To support future attributes beyond just headers (like the aforementioned transport info or cluster metadata), we might want to consider a more pluggable way to populate MatchContext. Currently, it has a fixed set of fields. A map-based approach or a registry of attribute providers might make it easier to add new attributes without changing the core MatchContext class every time. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR contains the core CEL evaluation logic and gRPC environment setup as defined in gRFC A106.
This is being carved out from #12640