Skip to content
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
48 changes: 30 additions & 18 deletions site/src/content/reset-status/latest.json
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -5,48 +5,60 @@
"confidence": "likely",
"observed_for_date": "2026-06-08",
"timezone": "Asia/Shanghai",
"generated_at": "2026-06-07T21:50:13Z",
"generated_at": "2026-06-08T08:19:17Z",
"source_account": "@thsottiaux",
"source_url": "https://x.com/thsottiaux",
"search_url": "https://x.com/search?q=from%3Athsottiaux%20since%3A2026-06-07%20until%3A2026-06-09&src=typed_query&f=live",
"judgment_mode": "ai_semantic_review",
"rationale": "Chrome/X was reachable for the 2026-06-08 Asia/Shanghai watch date. Broad X search returned no @thsottiaux results for the local-day coverage window, and refreshed profile plus replies timelines showed the newest visible @thsottiaux items were still June 6 posts about Codex settings, team praise, ChatGPT memory/token utility, and package install wording. An older June 4 usage-limit reset post was visible, but it is outside today's observed date. No visible June 8 post semantically indicated a rate-limit, quota, usage, message-cap, or reset-window recovery signal.",
"rationale": "Logged-in Chrome/X profile and broad X search were reachable for the 2026-06-08 Asia/Shanghai watch date. The visible local-day posts included a Codex 10X usage-limit promotion for selected builders, short replies about participation, and unrelated ChatGPT or Codex discussion. The usage-limit promotion is usage-adjacent, but it does not say limits reset, quotas recovered, message caps reset, or users should wait for a reset window. Thread context showed user replies asking about participation or complaining about limits, not a source-account reset signal. An older June 4 usage-limit reset post was visible, but it is outside today's observed date.",
"evidence_posts": [
{
"published_at_label": "2026-06-08 05:50 +08 observation",
"published_at_label": "2026-06-08 16:19 +08 observation",
"url": "https://x.com/search?q=from%3Athsottiaux%20since%3A2026-06-07%20until%3A2026-06-09&src=typed_query&f=live",
"relevance": "not_related",
"summary": "Logged-in Chrome/X search for @thsottiaux posts across the local-day coverage window returned no results. This is supporting evidence only because search can miss visible timeline items."
"summary": "Logged-in Chrome/X search for @thsottiaux posts across the local-day coverage window returned six visible June 8 Asia/Shanghai candidate posts. None semantically announced a reset or recovery window."
},
{
"published_at_label": "2026-06-06 04:39:31 +08 (outside observed_for_date; X datetime 2026-06-05T20:39:31Z)",
"url": "https://x.com/thsottiaux/status/2062997768470474765",
"published_at_label": "2026-06-08 06:21 +08 (X datetime 2026-06-07T22:21:38Z)",
"url": "https://x.com/thsottiaux/status/2063748242681307611",
"relevance": "not_related",
"summary": "@thsottiaux quoted an OpenAI Developers Codex settings update and commented on Codex papercuts/adoption. It was product-usability context, not a reset-window or quota recovery signal."
"summary": "@thsottiaux said Codex would select one person per day for 100 days to receive 10X usage limits for one month. This is usage-limit related, but it is a selective promotion, not a reset, quota recovery, message-cap recovery, or reset-window signal."
},
{
"published_at_label": "2026-06-06 04:39:57 +08 (outside observed_for_date; X datetime 2026-06-05T20:39:57Z)",
"url": "https://x.com/thsottiaux/status/2062997876297609257",
"published_at_label": "2026-06-08 11:33 +08 (X datetime 2026-06-08T03:33:50Z)",
"url": "https://x.com/thsottiaux/status/2063826811373658213",
"relevance": "not_related",
"summary": "@thsottiaux praised @simpsoka and team. It was one of the newest visible timeline items, but it did not mention resets, quotas, caps, or recovery windows."
"summary": "@thsottiaux replied that users should build things when asked how to participate in the 10X usage-limit promotion. Immediate thread context included third-party limit complaints, but the source-account reply did not announce a reset or recovery."
},
{
"published_at_label": "2026-06-06 02:35:46 +08 (outside observed_for_date; X datetime 2026-06-05T18:35:46Z)",
"url": "https://x.com/thsottiaux/status/2062966625733861752",
"published_at_label": "2026-06-08 14:14 +08 (X datetime 2026-06-08T06:14:33Z)",
"url": "https://x.com/thsottiaux/status/2063867254945767838",
"relevance": "not_related",
"summary": "@thsottiaux said better memory means shorter prompts and more utility per token while quoting a ChatGPT memory rollout. The token wording was usage-adjacent but did not indicate rate-limit reset, quota reset, message-cap recovery, or a reset window."
"summary": "@thsottiaux joked in a model-personality thread. It was unrelated to Codex rate limits, quotas, message caps, or reset windows."
},
{
"published_at_label": "2026-06-06 02:13:48 +08 (outside observed_for_date; X datetime 2026-06-05T18:13:48Z)",
"url": "https://x.com/thsottiaux/status/2062961096760447392",
"published_at_label": "2026-06-08 07:59 +08 (X datetime 2026-06-07T23:59:43Z)",
"url": "https://x.com/thsottiaux/status/2063772925644464276",
"relevance": "not_related",
"summary": "@thsottiaux corrected Codex package install wording to `uv add openai-codex`. This install note was unrelated to rate-limit resets, quota resets, usage resets, message caps, or recovery windows."
"summary": "@thsottiaux replied agreement in a thread about ChatGPT's personal-assistant direction. It was product-direction discussion, not a rate-limit reset signal."
},
{
"published_at_label": "2026-06-04 08:25:58 +08 (outside observed_for_date; X datetime 2026-06-04T00:25:58Z)",
"published_at_label": "2026-06-08 07:53 +08 (X datetime 2026-06-07T23:53:47Z)",
"url": "https://x.com/thsottiaux/status/2063771435194261915",
"relevance": "not_related",
"summary": "@thsottiaux replied in a thread about loops and attached media. The reply was not about reset behavior, quotas, usage caps, or recovery windows."
},
{
"published_at_label": "2026-06-08 07:52 +08 (X datetime 2026-06-07T23:52:05Z)",
"url": "https://x.com/thsottiaux/status/2063771005332697532",
"relevance": "not_related",
"summary": "@thsottiaux replied to a coding-agent usage poll with an adoption comment. Third-party replies mentioned rate limits, but the source-account post did not announce a reset or cap recovery."
},
{
"published_at_label": "2026-06-04 08:25 +08 (outside observed_for_date; X datetime 2026-06-04T00:25:58Z)",
"url": "https://x.com/thsottiaux/status/2062329981548802523",
"relevance": "not_related",
"summary": "An older @thsottiaux post did announce that Codex usage limits had been reset across paid plans. It confirms the kind of semantic signal being watched for, but it is outside the June 8 watch date."
"summary": "An older @thsottiaux post did announce that Codex usage limits had been reset across paid plans. It confirms the target semantic pattern, but it is outside the June 8 watch date."
}
]
}