Skip to content

A comprehensive framework for evaluating AI agent performance across multiple dimensions, including semantic accuracy, bias, toxicity, and reasoning quality.

Notifications You must be signed in to change notification settings

happybear-21/ai-agent-evaluation-framework

Folders and files

NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date

Latest commit

 

History

1 Commit
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Repository files navigation

AI Agent Evaluation Framework

A comprehensive framework for evaluating AI agent performance across multiple dimensions, including semantic accuracy, bias, toxicity, and reasoning quality.

Overview

This framework enables systematic and scalable evaluation of AI agents, focusing on response quality, factual correctness, ethical concerns, and reasoning capabilities. It provides robust metrics, visualization tools, and automated reporting for research, product development, and risk monitoring.

Features

  • Multi-dimensional evaluation metrics
  • Semantic similarity and embedding-based analysis
  • Bias and toxicity detection (threshold-configurable)
  • Factual accuracy and hallucination checks
  • Reasoning quality evaluation
  • Interactive performance visualization dashboard
  • Automated reporting and trend analysis
  • Parallel and adaptive evaluation for large datasets
  • Custom scoring via LLM-based judges (e.g., GPT-4)

Installation

Clone the repository and install the required dependencies:

git clone https://github.com/happybear-21/ai-agent-evaluation-framework
cd ai-agent-evaluation-framework
pip install -r requirements.txt

Evaluation Metrics

The framework evaluates AI responses across multiple dimensions:

  • Semantic Similarity
  • Factual Accuracy
  • Hallucination Detection
  • Bias and Toxicity Assessment
  • Reasoning Quality
  • Relevance to Input
  • Instruction Following
  • Creativity Assessment
  • Consistency Evaluation

Configuration

The evaluator accepts custom configuration parameters:

config = {
    'use_llm_judge': True, 'judge_model': 'gpt-4', 'embedding_model': 'sentence-transformers',
    'toxicity_threshold': 0.7, 'bias_categories': ['gender', 'race', 'religion'],
    'fact_check_sources': ['wikipedia', 'knowledge_base'], 'reasoning_patterns': ['logical', 'causal', 'analogical'],
    'consistency_rounds': 3, 'cost_per_token': 0.00002, 'parallel_workers': 8,
    'confidence_level': 0.95, 'adaptive_sampling': True, 'metric_weights': {
        'semantic_similarity': 0.15, 'hallucination_score': 0.15, 'toxicity_score': 0.1,
        'bias_score': 0.1, 'factual_accuracy': 0.15, 'reasoning_quality': 0.15,
        'response_relevance': 0.1, 'instruction_following': 0.1
    }
}

evaluator = AdvancedAIEvaluator(agent_func, config=config)

Output

The evaluation framework provides:

  1. Comprehensive evaluation reports
  2. Performance visualizations
  3. Risk assessments
  4. Trend analysis
  5. Correlation matrices
  6. Statistical confidence intervals

About

A comprehensive framework for evaluating AI agent performance across multiple dimensions, including semantic accuracy, bias, toxicity, and reasoning quality.

Resources

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Releases

No releases published

Packages

No packages published

Languages