FE-225: Petrinaut: Setup rolldown-plugin-dts and update @typeScript/native-preview + vite

[kube]

🌟 What is the purpose of this PR?

Setup rolldown-plugin-dts for TypeScript definition files generation, and rely on @typescript/native-preview.

Before

λ time yarn build
yarn build  27.31s user 1.96s system 210% cpu 13.882 total

After

λ time yarn build
yarn build  15.84s user 1.78s system 263% cpu 6.693 total

Pre-Merge Checklist 🚀

🚢 Has this modified a publishable library?

This PR:

• does not modify any publishable blocks or libraries, or modifications do not need publishing

📜 Does this require a change to the docs?

The changes in this PR:

• are internal and do not require a docs change

🕸️ Does this require a change to the Turbo Graph?

The changes in this PR:

• do not affect the execution graph

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project	Deployment	Actions	Updated (UTC)
hash	Ready	Preview, Comment	Mar 10, 2026 10:15am
petrinaut	Ready	Preview	Mar 10, 2026 10:15am

2 Skipped Deployments

Project	Deployment	Actions	Updated (UTC)
hashdotdesign	Ignored	Preview	Mar 10, 2026 10:15am
hashdotdesign-tokens	Ignored	Preview	Mar 10, 2026 10:15am

[cursor]

PR Summary

Medium Risk
Moderate risk because it changes how dist/*.d.ts is produced (and upgrades Vite/rolldown tooling), which could alter published type output or build behavior for consumers.

Overview
Build pipeline update for Petrinaut. Replaces vite-plugin-dts with rolldown-plugin-dts (enabled only on vite build) and uses tsgo for faster declaration generation, including a small Vite plugin ordering tweak to run before Vite’s TS transform.

Updates tooling deps (vite beta bump, @typescript/native-preview bump, adds rolldown/rolldown-plugin-dts) and removes declaration emit settings from tsconfig since declarations are now handled by the build. Adds a @fontsource-variable/jetbrains-mono module stub for tsgo, and tightens Petrinaut’s export typing to FunctionComponent<PetrinautProps>.

^{Written by Cursor Bugbot for commit d04280a. This will update automatically on new commits. Configure here.}

[kube]

• H-5655: Refactor selection logic and migrate to @xyflow/react v12 #8523 : 2 dependent PRs (#8528 , #8532 )
• FE-225: Petrinaut: Setup rolldown-plugin-dts and update @typeScript/native-preview + vite #8509 👈 (View in Graphite)
• FE-225, H-6116, H-6286: Update Petrinaut UI #8472 : 1 other dependent PR (#8463 )
• H-5839, FE-488: Petrinaut: LSP-like interface for Diagnostics and Code Editor #8300
• FE-223, H-5780, H-6227: Setup Petrinaut inside HASH + Build with Vite 8 and TypeScript 7 #8369
• main

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

[augmentcode]

🤖 Augment PR Summary

Summary: This PR updates Petrinaut’s build toolchain as a temporary patch, focusing on newer Vite/TypeScript preview tooling and a different DTS generation plugin.

Changes:

• Bumped @typescript/native-preview to 7.0.0-dev.20260306.1.
• Updated vite from 8.0.0-beta.14 to 8.0.0-beta.16.
• Replaced vite-plugin-dts with rolldown-plugin-dts in vite.config.ts.
• Enabled tsgo-based declaration generation and adjusted plugin enforcement so the “fake-js” step runs pre the native TS transform.

Technical Notes: The package still declares types: dist/main.d.ts, so the new DTS plugin needs to continue producing that entrypoint (and avoid emitting story/test types into the published output).

_{🤖 Was this summary useful? React with 👍 or 👎}

[augmentcode]

Review completed. 2 suggestions posted.

Comment augment review to trigger a new review at any time.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 62.64%. Comparing base (6df3785) to head (d04280a).

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #8509      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   62.65%   62.64%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files        1312     1312              
  Lines      133689   133689              
  Branches     5510     5510              
==========================================
- Hits        83757    83756       -1     
- Misses      49018    49019       +1     
  Partials      914      914              

Flag	Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts	1.40% <ø> (ø)
apps.hash-api	0.00% <ø> (ø)
blockprotocol.type-system	40.84% <ø> (ø)
local.claude-hooks	0.00% <ø> (ø)
local.harpc-client	51.24% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-graph-sdk	7.73% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-isomorphic-utils	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.antsi	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.error-stack	90.88% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-codec	84.70% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-net	96.14% <ø> (-0.02%)	⬇️
rust.harpc-tower	66.80% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-types	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-wire-protocol	92.23% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-codec	72.76% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-api	2.64% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-authorization	62.34% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-postgres-store	26.64% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-store	37.88% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-temporal-versioning	47.95% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-types	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-validation	83.45% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-ast	87.23% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-compiletest	29.69% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-core	82.29% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-diagnostics	72.43% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-eval	69.13% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-hir	89.06% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-mir	92.59% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-syntax-jexpr	94.05% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[codspeed-hq]

Merging this PR will not alter performance

✅ 80 untouched benchmarks

---

_{Comparing cf/petrinaut-tsgo-dts (d04280a) with main (6df3785)}

[cursor]

Cursor Bugbot has reviewed your changes and found 1 potential issue.

^{Bugbot Autofix is OFF. To automatically fix reported issues with cloud agents, enable autofix in the Cursor dashboard.}

[github-actions]

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2002	$$27.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 150 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.854 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.52 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.071 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1001	$$12.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 96.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.652 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 3314	$$44.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 324 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.864 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$15.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 102 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.240 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 1526	$$24.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 143 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.557 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 2078	$$28.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 175 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.353 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.83 \mathrm{ms} \pm 22.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.050 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 1033	$$13.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 107 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.961 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_medium

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 102	$$3.91 \mathrm{ms} \pm 21.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.554 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.11 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.239 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 51	$$3.47 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.796 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 269	$$5.33 \mathrm{ms} \pm 26.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.688 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.67 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.835 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 107	$$4.25 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.087 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 133	$$4.59 \mathrm{ms} \pm 32.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.430 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.56 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.140 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 63	$$4.17 \mathrm{ms} \pm 22.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.476 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_none

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2	$$2.84 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.711 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.78 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.365 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1	$$2.90 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.091 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 8	$$3.18 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.354 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.96 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.006 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 3	$$3.29 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.548 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_small

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 52	$$3.21 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.178 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.92 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.458 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 25	$$3.06 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.174 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 94	$$3.64 \mathrm{ms} \pm 21.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.077 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.20 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.182 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 26	$$3.43 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.916 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 66	$$3.57 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.573 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.19 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.263 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 29	$$3.48 \mathrm{ms} \pm 21.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.120 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_complete

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id;one_depth	1 entities	$$42.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 239 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.699 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	10 entities	$$79.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 375 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.349 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	25 entities	$$45.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 160 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.011 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	5 entities	$$49.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 252 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.04 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	50 entities	$$56.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 290 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.865 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	1 entities	$$43.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 192 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.013 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	10 entities	$$424 \mathrm{ms} \pm 960 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.999 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	25 entities	$$99.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 406 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.595 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	5 entities	$$89.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 438 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.29 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	50 entities	$$289 \mathrm{ms} \pm 714 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.490 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	1 entities	$$15.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 78.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.065 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	10 entities	$$16.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 80.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.184 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	25 entities	$$16.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 77.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.267 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	5 entities	$$16.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 83.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.515 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	50 entities	$$18.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 108 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.499 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$15.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 74.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.242 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$15.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 85.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.63 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$15.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 71.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.300 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$16.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 88.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.745 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$23.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 171 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.88 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1	$$32.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 264 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.37 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1	$$32.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 260 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.79 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1	$$31.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 276 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.48 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1	$$30.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 286 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.05 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2	$$31.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 312 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.02 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1	$$31.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 279 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.751 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1	$$31.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 289 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.11 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1	$$31.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 316 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.71 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1	$$32.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 315 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.45 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: bf5a9ef5-dc3b-43cf-a291-6210c0321eba	$$8.68 \mathrm{ms} \pm 41.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.502 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$90.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 412 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.942 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$142 \mathrm{ms} \pm 630 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.429 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$96.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 507 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.138 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$105 \mathrm{ms} \pm 417 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.608 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$114 \mathrm{ms} \pm 470 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.490 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$121 \mathrm{ms} \pm 530 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.869 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$88.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 503 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.955 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$117 \mathrm{ms} \pm 617 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.170 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$95.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 478 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.474 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$104 \mathrm{ms} \pm 567 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.061 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$106 \mathrm{ms} \pm 517 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.923 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$106 \mathrm{ms} \pm 459 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.560 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$

scenarios

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
full_test	query-limited	$$131 \mathrm{ms} \pm 520 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-8.414 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
full_test	query-unlimited	$$133 \mathrm{ms} \pm 470 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.049 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-limited	$$123 \mathrm{ms} \pm 555 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}196 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-unlimited	$$598 \mathrm{ms} \pm 3.90 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{red}5.67 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 62.64%. Comparing base (6df3785) to head (d04280a).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #8509      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   62.65%   62.64%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files        1312     1312              
  Lines      133689   133689              
  Branches     5510     5510              
==========================================
- Hits        83757    83756       -1     
- Misses      49018    49019       +1     
  Partials      914      914              

Flag	Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts	1.40% <ø> (ø)
apps.hash-api	0.00% <ø> (ø)
blockprotocol.type-system	40.84% <ø> (ø)
local.claude-hooks	0.00% <ø> (ø)
local.harpc-client	51.24% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-graph-sdk	7.73% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-isomorphic-utils	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.antsi	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.error-stack	90.88% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-codec	84.70% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-net	96.14% <ø> (-0.02%)	⬇️
rust.harpc-tower	66.80% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-types	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-wire-protocol	92.23% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-codec	72.76% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-api	2.64% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-authorization	62.34% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-postgres-store	26.64% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-store	37.88% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-temporal-versioning	47.95% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-types	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-validation	83.45% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-ast	87.23% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-compiletest	29.69% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-core	82.29% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-diagnostics	72.43% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-eval	69.13% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-hir	89.06% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-mir	92.59% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-syntax-jexpr	94.05% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.