Bump tar from 7.5.9 to 7.5.10 by dependabot[bot] · Pull Request #8516 · hashintel/hash

dependabot · 2026-03-06T19:37:36Z

Bumps tar from 7.5.9 to 7.5.10.

Commits

2b72abc 7.5.10
7bc755d parse root off paths before sanitizing .. parts
c8cb846 update deps
See full diff in compare view

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.

Dependabot commands and options

You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:

@dependabot rebase will rebase this PR
@dependabot recreate will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it
@dependabot show <dependency name> ignore conditions will show all of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency
@dependabot ignore this major version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
@dependabot ignore this minor version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
@dependabot ignore this dependency will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
You can disable automated security fix PRs for this repo from the Security Alerts page.

Bumps [tar](https://github.com/isaacs/node-tar) from 7.5.9 to 7.5.10. - [Release notes](https://github.com/isaacs/node-tar/releases) - [Changelog](https://github.com/isaacs/node-tar/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md) - [Commits](isaacs/node-tar@v7.5.9...v7.5.10) --- updated-dependencies: - dependency-name: tar dependency-version: 7.5.10 dependency-type: indirect ... Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>

cursor · 2026-03-06T19:37:42Z

PR Summary

Low Risk
Lockfile-only dependency patch bump; low risk aside from potential minor behavior changes in tar during install/build tooling.

Overview
Updates the tar npm dependency in yarn.lock from 7.5.9 to 7.5.10, refreshing the resolved version and lockfile checksum accordingly.

^{Written by Cursor Bugbot for commit ffe9ec0. This will update automatically on new commits. Configure here.}

vercel · 2026-03-06T19:37:43Z

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project	Deployment	Actions	Updated (UTC)
hash	Ready	Preview, Comment	Mar 10, 2026 5:39pm
hashdotdesign	Ready	Preview, Comment	Mar 10, 2026 5:39pm
hashdotdesign-tokens	Ready	Preview, Comment	Mar 10, 2026 5:39pm
petrinaut	Ready	Preview	Mar 10, 2026 5:39pm

augmentcode · 2026-03-06T19:38:27Z

🤖 Augment PR Summary

Summary: Updates the npm dependency tar from 7.5.9 to 7.5.10 via a lockfile refresh.

Why: Pulls in the upstream 7.5.10 release (including path parsing/sanitization fixes and dependency updates) without touching application source code.

_{🤖 Was this summary useful? React with 👍 or 👎}

augmentcode

Review completed. No suggestions at this time.

Comment augment review to trigger a new review at any time.

codspeed-hq · 2026-03-06T19:46:40Z

Merging this PR will not alter performance

✅ 80 untouched benchmarks

_{Comparing dependabot/npm_and_yarn/tar-7.5.10 (ffe9ec0) with main (7e7f05d)}

codecov · 2026-03-10T17:27:07Z

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 62.65%. Comparing base (153fb35) to head (ffe9ec0).
⚠️ Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #8516   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   62.65%   62.65%           
=======================================
  Files        1312     1312           
  Lines      133689   133689           
  Branches     5510     5510           
=======================================
  Hits        83757    83757           
  Misses      49018    49018           
  Partials      914      914

Flag	Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts	`1.40% <ø> (ø)`
apps.hash-api	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
blockprotocol.type-system	`40.84% <ø> (ø)`
local.claude-hooks	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
local.harpc-client	`51.24% <ø> (ø)`
local.hash-graph-sdk	`7.73% <ø> (ø)`
local.hash-isomorphic-utils	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
rust.antsi	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
rust.error-stack	`90.88% <ø> (ø)`
rust.harpc-codec	`84.70% <ø> (ø)`
rust.harpc-net	`96.16% <ø> (ø)`
rust.harpc-tower	`66.80% <ø> (ø)`
rust.harpc-types	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
rust.harpc-wire-protocol	`92.23% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-codec	`72.76% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-api	`2.64% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-authorization	`62.34% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-postgres-store	`26.64% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-temporal-versioning	`47.95% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-types	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-validation	`83.45% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-ast	`87.23% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-compiletest	`29.69% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-core	`82.29% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-diagnostics	`72.43% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-eval	`69.13% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-hir	`89.06% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-syntax-jexpr	`94.05% <ø> (ø)`

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

github-actions · 2026-03-10T18:35:09Z

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2002	$$27.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 165 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.432 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.53 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.434 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1001	$$12.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 72.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.910 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 3314	$$43.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 302 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.389 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$15.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 106 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.53 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 1526	$$24.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 164 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.305 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 2078	$$28.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 229 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.585 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.85 \mathrm{ms} \pm 23.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.594 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 1033	$$13.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 109 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.553 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_medium

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 102	$$3.94 \mathrm{ms} \pm 21.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.06 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.12 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.558 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 51	$$3.49 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.483 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 269	$$5.36 \mathrm{ms} \pm 25.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.159 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.76 \mathrm{ms} \pm 23.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.806 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 107	$$4.30 \mathrm{ms} \pm 22.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.489 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 133	$$4.61 \mathrm{ms} \pm 29.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.163 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.58 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.820 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 63	$$4.22 \mathrm{ms} \pm 24.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.635 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_none

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2	$$2.85 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.063 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.82 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.778 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1	$$2.93 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.869 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 8	$$3.18 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.098 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.00 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.236 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 3	$$3.31 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.075 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_small

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 52	$$3.23 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.154 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.93 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.454 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 25	$$3.07 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.069 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 94	$$3.65 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.733 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.21 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.023 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 26	$$3.42 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.213 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 66	$$3.56 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.943 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.19 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.134 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 29	$$3.53 \mathrm{ms} \pm 23.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.04 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_complete

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id;one_depth	1 entities	$$42.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 227 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.96 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	10 entities	$$79.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 401 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.204 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	25 entities	$$47.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 221 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.27 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	5 entities	$$48.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 247 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.046 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	50 entities	$$57.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 383 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.078 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	1 entities	$$43.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 169 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.399 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	10 entities	$$420 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.02 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}0.349 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	25 entities	$$101 \mathrm{ms} \pm 635 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.23 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	5 entities	$$87.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 353 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.949 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	50 entities	$$287 \mathrm{ms} \pm 934 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-9.932 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	1 entities	$$16.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 97.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.974 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	10 entities	$$16.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 95.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.289 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	25 entities	$$16.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 79.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.245 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	5 entities	$$16.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 91.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.60 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	50 entities	$$19.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 95.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.939 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$16.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 62.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.01 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$16.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 82.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.780 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$16.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 82.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.875 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$16.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 71.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.050 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$24.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 179 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.435 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1`	$$31.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 320 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.55 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1`	$$31.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 304 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.16 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1`	$$31.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 243 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.882 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1`	$$31.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 274 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.963 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2`	$$32.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 336 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.79 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1`	$$32.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 289 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.00 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1`	$$32.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 280 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.10 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1`	$$31.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 247 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.364 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1`	$$31.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 267 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.567 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: `bf5a9ef5-dc3b-43cf-a291-6210c0321eba`	$$8.92 \mathrm{ms} \pm 47.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.042 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$90.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 465 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.746 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$142 \mathrm{ms} \pm 607 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.303 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$98.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 581 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.308 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$105 \mathrm{ms} \pm 559 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.986 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$114 \mathrm{ms} \pm 681 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.401 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$121 \mathrm{ms} \pm 629 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.810 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$87.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 413 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.170 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$118 \mathrm{ms} \pm 731 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.175 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$95.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 547 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.521 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$104 \mathrm{ms} \pm 508 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.319 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$107 \mathrm{ms} \pm 478 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.080 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$106 \mathrm{ms} \pm 517 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.274 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$

scenarios

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
full_test	query-limited	$$137 \mathrm{ms} \pm 461 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.85 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
full_test	query-unlimited	$$139 \mathrm{ms} \pm 457 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.91 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-limited	$$105 \mathrm{ms} \pm 495 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.004 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-unlimited	$$585 \mathrm{ms} \pm 3.05 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}-3.991 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

dependabot bot added dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file javascript Pull requests that update Javascript code labels Mar 6, 2026

github-actions bot added the area/deps Relates to third-party dependencies (area) label Mar 6, 2026

augmentcode bot reviewed Mar 6, 2026

View reviewed changes

vercel bot deployed to Preview – hashdotdesign-tokens March 6, 2026 19:39 View deployment

vercel bot deployed to Preview – hashdotdesign March 6, 2026 19:40 View deployment

vercel bot deployed to Preview – petrinaut March 6, 2026 19:41 View deployment

CiaranMn approved these changes Mar 6, 2026

View reviewed changes

CiaranMn enabled auto-merge March 6, 2026 19:46

vercel bot deployed to Preview – hash March 6, 2026 19:51 View deployment

Merge branch 'main' into dependabot/npm_and_yarn/tar-7.5.10

ffe9ec0

vercel bot deployed to Preview – hashdotdesign-tokens March 10, 2026 17:25 View deployment

vercel bot deployed to Preview – hashdotdesign March 10, 2026 17:26 View deployment

vercel bot deployed to Preview – petrinaut March 10, 2026 17:26 View deployment

vercel bot deployed to Preview – hash March 10, 2026 17:39 View deployment

CiaranMn added this pull request to the merge queue Mar 10, 2026

Merged via the queue into main with commit 146c9de Mar 10, 2026
198 of 229 checks passed

CiaranMn deleted the dependabot/npm_and_yarn/tar-7.5.10 branch March 10, 2026 18:22

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Bump tar from 7.5.9 to 7.5.10#8516

Bump tar from 7.5.9 to 7.5.10#8516
CiaranMn merged 2 commits intomainfrom
dependabot/npm_and_yarn/tar-7.5.10

dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Mar 6, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

cursor bot commented Mar 6, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

vercel bot commented Mar 6, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

augmentcode bot commented Mar 6, 2026

Uh oh!

augmentcode bot left a comment

Uh oh!

codspeed-hq bot commented Mar 6, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

codecov bot commented Mar 10, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

github-actions bot commented Mar 10, 2026

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

policy_resolution_medium

policy_resolution_none

policy_resolution_small

read_scaling_complete

read_scaling_linkless

representative_read_entity

representative_read_entity_type

representative_read_multiple_entities

scenarios

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

1 participant

Conversation

dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Mar 6, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

cursor bot commented Mar 6, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

PR Summary

Uh oh!

vercel bot commented Mar 6, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

augmentcode bot commented Mar 6, 2026

Uh oh!

augmentcode bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

codspeed-hq bot commented Mar 6, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Merging this PR will not alter performance

Uh oh!

codecov bot commented Mar 10, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Codecov Report

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

github-actions bot commented Mar 10, 2026

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

policy_resolution_medium

policy_resolution_none

policy_resolution_small

read_scaling_complete

read_scaling_linkless

representative_read_entity

representative_read_entity_type

representative_read_multiple_entities

scenarios

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

1 participant

dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Mar 6, 2026 •

edited

Loading

cursor bot commented Mar 6, 2026 •

edited

Loading

vercel bot commented Mar 6, 2026 •

edited

Loading

codspeed-hq bot commented Mar 6, 2026 •

edited

Loading

codecov bot commented Mar 10, 2026 •

edited

Loading