H-5655: Refactor selection logic and migrate to @xyflow/react v12 by kube · Pull Request #8523 · hashintel/hash

kube · 2026-03-07T19:36:11Z

🌟 What is the purpose of this PR?

Refactor the selection logic in Petrinaut and migrate to @xyflow/react v12. This centralizes selection state in EditorContext, adds multi-selection support, and improves keyboard shortcut handling.

🔗 Related links

H-5655 (internal)

🔍 What does this change?

Migrate to @xyflow/react v12 with updated APIs and types
Centralize selection state in EditorContext with isSelected/hasSelection helpers
Add multi-selection support — click nodes/arcs with modifier keys, with a new multi-selection panel in Properties
Add arc properties panel for viewing/editing selected arcs
Make Delete/Backspace work globally for all selected item types (places, transitions, arcs)
Batch multi-node drag position commits into single atomic mutations
Highlight selected nodes in MiniMap
Add partial selection setting in viewport settings dialog
Remove browser tests and related dependencies
Fix stale selection race conditions and restrict arc selection to click-only
Add selection cleanup hook to handle removed items

Pre-Merge Checklist 🚀

🚢 Has this modified a publishable library?

This PR:

modifies an npm-publishable library and I have added a changeset file(s)

📜 Does this require a change to the docs?

The changes in this PR:

are internal and do not require a docs change

🕸️ Does this require a change to the Turbo Graph?

The changes in this PR:

do not affect the execution graph

⚠️ Known issues

Selection synchronization between EditorContext and ReactFlow's internal state still needs enhancements
Selection logic is functional but not perfect — will need reworking later

🐾 Next steps

Comprehensive testing pass needed once dependent features are built
Further refinement of selection sync between EditorContext and ReactFlow
This provides a solid foundation to build on, but the selection system will need another iteration

🛡 What tests cover this?

No automated tests — browser tests were removed as part of this PR

❓ How to test this?

Checkout the branch / view the deployment
Open a Petri net in the editor
Select nodes, transitions, and arcs — verify single and multi-selection works
Use Delete/Backspace to remove selected items
Drag multiple selected nodes and verify positions update atomically
Check MiniMap highlights selected nodes

vercel · 2026-03-07T19:36:18Z

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project	Deployment	Actions	Updated (UTC)
hash	Error		Mar 11, 2026 9:48am
hashdotdesign	Ready	Preview, Comment	Mar 11, 2026 9:48am
hashdotdesign-tokens	Ready	Preview, Comment	Mar 11, 2026 9:48am
petrinaut	Ready	Preview	Mar 11, 2026 9:48am

kube · 2026-03-07T19:36:30Z

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

cursor · 2026-03-09T23:53:00Z

PR Summary

Medium Risk
Touches core editor selection/deletion and ReactFlow integration, so regressions could affect basic canvas interactions (select/drag/delete) despite being mostly internal UI/state refactors.

Overview
Upgrades Petrinaut from reactflow to @xyflow/react v12 (deps, types, CSS import, and updated APIs like screenToFlowPosition, store lookups, and selection config).

Refactors selection into a typed SelectionMap in EditorContext with helpers (isSelected, hasSelection, toggle/add/remove), adds reactive selection cleanup on model mutation, and updates all panels/lists to support multi-select via ctrl/meta-click.

Adds new properties UI for arcs (ArcProperties) and for multi-selection summaries/actions, plus global Delete/Backspace handling via keyboard shortcuts; deletion now accepts the typed selection map and cascades correctly across places/transitions/arcs/types/equations/parameters.

Adjusts layout/drag position math to consistently treat SDCPN positions as center coordinates (dims-aware) and commits drag-end updates atomically; adds a user setting for partial box selection and highlights selected nodes in the minimap.

^{Written by Cursor Bugbot for commit 0b08c25. This will update automatically on new commits. Configure here.}

- Extract selection state into dedicated module with SelectionMap type - Add arc selection and multi-selection support in properties panel - Migrate from reactflow v11 to @xyflow/react v12 - Fix node centering by offsetting positions in mapper instead of CSS transforms - Add measured dimensions to nodes to fix arc invisibility after large moves - Add browser tests for SDCPNView with vitest-browser-playwright - Update node dimensions to match actual visual sizes for classic/compact modes Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

…tests Remove dual selection management between onNodeClick/onEdgeClick and ReactFlow's internal handleNodeClick. Selection now flows exclusively through ReactFlow → onNodesChange → useApplyNodeChanges → setSelection, fixing meta+click multi-select which was broken by conflicting handlers. Fix multi-node drag position commit by reading change.position directly from ReactFlow events instead of stale draggingStateByNodeId closure. Add integration test file using real EditorProvider + controlled SDCPNContext covering click selection, meta+click toggle, pane clear, single/multi-node drag, and keyboard delete. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

…ation Previously each dragged node's position was committed via a separate mutatePetriNetDefinition call, causing a visual snap-back glitch when the dragging state was cleared before all positions were flushed. Now all position updates are applied in one mutatePetriNetDefinition call. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

…only - setSelection now accepts a functional updater so concurrent onNodesChange/onEdgesChange calls chain against latest state instead of clobbering each other via stale closures. - Arcs are excluded from drag-to-select; a dedicated onEdgeClick handler makes them selectable only by direct click. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

Add a `partialSelection` user setting (default true) that controls whether drag-to-select picks up partially intersected nodes. Refactor the viewport settings dialog to use a reusable SettingRow grid component. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

Remove FocusNodeRegistrar and all focusNode/registerFocusNode plumbing from the editor context. Viewport centering on node selection will be revisited as a dedicated feature. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

Selected nodes render with a light blue fill and stroke in the MiniMap. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

Move deletion keyboard handling from SDCPNView's onKeyDown to the global keyboard shortcuts hook using useEffectEvent, so Delete/Backspace works from anywhere in Petrinaut. Extend deleteItemsByIds to also handle types, differential equations, and parameters. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

…temsByIds Expose `isSelected(id)` and `hasSelection` from EditorContext so consumers no longer need direct access to the SelectionMap for simple lookups. Change `deleteItemsByIds` to accept typed SelectionMap, enabling it to partition by item type and skip irrelevant collections. Migrate all 12 UI consumers. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

…e test deps - Convert ELK top-left positions to center coordinates in calculateGraphLayout, matching the convention used by useSdcpnToReactFlow and useApplyNodeChanges - Accept dims parameter instead of using deprecated nodeDimensions alias, so layout uses correct dimensions for compact vs classic mode - Fix selection guards to check base map instead of prevSelection, preventing previously-selected canvas nodes from being dropped during box-select when non-canvas items are selected - Re-add @testing-library/dom and @testing-library/react devDependencies needed by unit tests that were incorrectly removed with browser test cleanup Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

github-actions · 2026-03-11T01:47:53Z

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2002	$$27.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 168 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.454 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.53 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.862 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1001	$$12.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 90.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.83 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 3314	$$43.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 341 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.986 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$15.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 122 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.26 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 1526	$$24.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 224 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.129 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 2078	$$29.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 188 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.13 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.89 \mathrm{ms} \pm 25.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.324 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 1033	$$14.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 122 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}8.52 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_medium

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 102	$$4.01 \mathrm{ms} \pm 27.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.18 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.16 \mathrm{ms} \pm 21.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.37 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 51	$$3.49 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.545 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 269	$$5.39 \mathrm{ms} \pm 30.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.420 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.72 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.620 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 107	$$4.31 \mathrm{ms} \pm 26.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.436 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 133	$$4.63 \mathrm{ms} \pm 25.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.627 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.62 \mathrm{ms} \pm 22.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.09 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 63	$$4.35 \mathrm{ms} \pm 37.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.88 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_none

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2	$$2.85 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.634 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.83 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.40 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1	$$2.93 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.25 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 8	$$3.19 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.817 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.98 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.167 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 3	$$3.29 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.175 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_small

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 52	$$3.21 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.331 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.98 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.94 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 25	$$3.08 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.543 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 94	$$3.65 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.153 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.18 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.244 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 26	$$3.47 \mathrm{ms} \pm 24.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.727 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 66	$$3.59 \mathrm{ms} \pm 24.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.742 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.20 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.764 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 29	$$3.47 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.188 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_complete

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id;one_depth	1 entities	$$42.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 212 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.92 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	10 entities	$$81.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 440 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.72 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	25 entities	$$47.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 234 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.107 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	5 entities	$$49.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 384 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.52 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	50 entities	$$59.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 329 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.46 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	1 entities	$$45.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 173 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.01 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	10 entities	$$428 \mathrm{ms} \pm 867 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.916 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	25 entities	$$97.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 480 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.727 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	5 entities	$$90.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 427 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.36 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	50 entities	$$319 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.01 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{red}8.52 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	1 entities	$$16.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 77.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.620 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	10 entities	$$16.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 99.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.143 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	25 entities	$$16.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 92.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.76 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	5 entities	$$16.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 79.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.49 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	50 entities	$$19.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 126 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.063 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$15.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 90.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.793 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$15.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 84.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.076 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$16.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 93.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.61 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$16.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 107 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.344 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$23.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 175 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.058 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1`	$$30.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 281 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.827 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1`	$$31.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 290 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.14 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1`	$$31.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 269 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.69 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1`	$$31.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 288 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.453 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2`	$$31.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 262 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.07 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1`	$$30.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 339 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.962 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1`	$$30.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 339 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.615 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1`	$$30.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 267 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.889 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1`	$$31.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 262 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.940 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: `bf5a9ef5-dc3b-43cf-a291-6210c0321eba`	$$8.86 \mathrm{ms} \pm 52.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.638 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$90.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 489 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.45 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$143 \mathrm{ms} \pm 546 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.102 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$98.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 588 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.22 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$107 \mathrm{ms} \pm 453 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.313 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$115 \mathrm{ms} \pm 481 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.516 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$123 \mathrm{ms} \pm 476 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.708 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$86.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 426 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.604 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$116 \mathrm{ms} \pm 587 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.074 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$94.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 522 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.559 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$104 \mathrm{ms} \pm 526 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.552 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$106 \mathrm{ms} \pm 496 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.108 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$107 \mathrm{ms} \pm 525 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.347 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$

scenarios

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
full_test	query-limited	$$140 \mathrm{ms} \pm 629 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.73 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
full_test	query-unlimited	$$141 \mathrm{ms} \pm 471 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.62 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-limited	$$105 \mathrm{ms} \pm 616 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}163 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-unlimited	$$583 \mathrm{ms} \pm 2.99 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}1.03 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

github-actions bot added area/deps Relates to third-party dependencies (area) area/libs Relates to first-party libraries/crates/packages (area) type/eng > frontend Owned by the @frontend team labels Mar 7, 2026

kube mentioned this pull request Mar 7, 2026

H-5641: Probability Distributions in Petrinaut #8463

Merged

3 tasks

kube mentioned this pull request Mar 7, 2026

H-6281, FE-501: Add undo/redo support to Petrinaut demo app #8505

Merged

3 tasks

vercel bot deployed to Preview – petrinaut March 7, 2026 19:39 View deployment

vercel bot deployed to Preview – hash March 7, 2026 20:03 View deployment

kube changed the base branch from cf/h-6281-basic-undoredo-in-petrinaut-demo-app to graphite-base/8523 March 9, 2026 10:38

kube force-pushed the graphite-base/8523 branch from 9b3ab34 to 5604e83 Compare March 9, 2026 12:48

kube force-pushed the cf/h-5655-refactor-selection-logic branch from a4cb46c to 4043333 Compare March 9, 2026 12:48

kube changed the base branch from graphite-base/8523 to cf/h-6281-basic-undoredo-in-petrinaut-demo-app March 9, 2026 12:48

vercel bot deployed to Preview – petrinaut March 9, 2026 12:51 View deployment

vercel bot deployed to Preview – hash March 9, 2026 13:02 View deployment

kube changed the base branch from cf/h-6281-basic-undoredo-in-petrinaut-demo-app to graphite-base/8523 March 9, 2026 17:44

kube force-pushed the graphite-base/8523 branch from 5604e83 to 9f3aa5b Compare March 9, 2026 22:09

kube force-pushed the cf/h-5655-refactor-selection-logic branch from 4043333 to 47518e4 Compare March 9, 2026 22:09

kube changed the base branch from graphite-base/8523 to main March 9, 2026 22:09

github-actions bot added the area/infra Relates to version control, CI, CD or IaC (area) label Mar 9, 2026

vercel bot deployed to Preview – petrinaut March 9, 2026 22:13 View deployment

vercel bot had a problem deploying to Preview – hash March 9, 2026 22:23 Failure

kube force-pushed the cf/h-5655-refactor-selection-logic branch from 47518e4 to 4a51729 Compare March 9, 2026 23:47

github-actions bot removed the area/infra Relates to version control, CI, CD or IaC (area) label Mar 9, 2026

vercel bot deployed to Preview – petrinaut March 9, 2026 23:50 View deployment

kube marked this pull request as ready for review March 9, 2026 23:52

graphite-app bot assigned kube Mar 9, 2026

github-actions bot added the area/infra Relates to version control, CI, CD or IaC (area) label Mar 9, 2026

vercel bot deployed to Preview – petrinaut March 9, 2026 23:55 View deployment

kube and others added 18 commits March 11, 2026 01:30

Temporary patch

ff5f3d3

Update yarn.lock

4f25988

H-5655: Highlight selected nodes in MiniMap

e7f6b48

Selected nodes render with a light blue fill and stroke in the MiniMap. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

H-5655: Remove browser tests and related dependencies

676a824

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

Update yarn.lock

085edcd

H-5655: Add changeset for selection logic refactor

610ade1

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

Fix from review

558b14d

Remove vite.browser.config.ts from ESLint allowDefaultProject

cb18de7

yarn fix:yarn-deduplicate

11b1e8b

kube force-pushed the cf/h-5655-refactor-selection-logic branch from 52a1e41 to 11b1e8b Compare March 11, 2026 00:32

vercel bot deployed to Preview – hashdotdesign-tokens March 11, 2026 00:34 View deployment

vercel bot deployed to Preview – hashdotdesign March 11, 2026 00:35 View deployment

vercel bot deployed to Preview – petrinaut March 11, 2026 00:35 View deployment

vercel bot had a problem deploying to Preview – hash March 11, 2026 00:48 Failure

yarn fix:yarn-deduplicate

0b08c25

vercel bot deployed to Preview – hashdotdesign-tokens March 11, 2026 09:38 View deployment

vercel bot deployed to Preview – hashdotdesign March 11, 2026 09:38 View deployment

vercel bot deployed to Preview – petrinaut March 11, 2026 09:39 View deployment

vercel bot had a problem deploying to Preview – hash March 11, 2026 09:48 Failure

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

H-5655: Refactor selection logic and migrate to @xyflow/react v12#8523

H-5655: Refactor selection logic and migrate to @xyflow/react v12#8523
kube wants to merge 19 commits intomainfrom
cf/h-5655-refactor-selection-logic

kube commented Mar 7, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

vercel bot commented Mar 7, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

kube commented Mar 7, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

cursor bot commented Mar 9, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

github-actions bot commented Mar 11, 2026

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

policy_resolution_medium

policy_resolution_none

policy_resolution_small

read_scaling_complete

read_scaling_linkless

representative_read_entity

representative_read_entity_type

representative_read_multiple_entities

scenarios

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

1 participant

Conversation

kube commented Mar 7, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

🌟 What is the purpose of this PR?

🔗 Related links

🔍 What does this change?

Pre-Merge Checklist 🚀

🚢 Has this modified a publishable library?

📜 Does this require a change to the docs?

🕸️ Does this require a change to the Turbo Graph?

⚠️ Known issues

🐾 Next steps

🛡 What tests cover this?

❓ How to test this?

Uh oh!

vercel bot commented Mar 7, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

kube commented Mar 7, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

cursor bot commented Mar 9, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

PR Summary

Uh oh!

github-actions bot commented Mar 11, 2026

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

policy_resolution_medium

policy_resolution_none

policy_resolution_small

read_scaling_complete

read_scaling_linkless

representative_read_entity

representative_read_entity_type

representative_read_multiple_entities

scenarios

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

1 participant

kube commented Mar 7, 2026 •

edited

Loading

vercel bot commented Mar 7, 2026 •

edited

Loading

kube commented Mar 7, 2026 •

edited

Loading

cursor bot commented Mar 9, 2026 •

edited

Loading