Add hush - #44
Add hush#44emreozyoruk wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: defaults Review profile: CHILL Plan: Advanced Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 1 included review per hour; 0 remain after this review. 📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe project catalog adds ChangesProject catalog
Priority: ⬇️ Low Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~3 minutes Change: Feature Suggested reviewers: 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
✅ Passed checks (4 passed)
Full details: Description checkExplanation The description explains the project, its Jev integration, and its category. It does not include the required template headings or confirm the validation, generated-file, and author or announcement checklist items. Resolution Add the required Project and Where Jev fits sections. Confirm that one object was added to data/projects.json and npm run validate was run, that README.md and site/index.html were not committed, and that the author or project announcement source is linked.
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Warning Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
|
Landed on main as 4f5d1cc with you as the commit author, so it shows on your contributions. Live at https://awesomejev.com/#integrations. Closing the PR rather than merging because the site's data file gets appended to nightly, which makes fork branches conflict faster than they can be reviewed. Landing the entry directly keeps your authorship without force-pushing to your fork. Thanks for the submission. |
hush — a GitHub Action that triages new issues with Jev and abstains when it isn't sure.
Label, spam, needs-more-info and possible-duplicate all travel in one
/v1/systemonecall. Each verdict is applied only when it clears a threshold the maintainer sets — the label question gates on both the option's probability and the answer's confidence — and below the line the action leaves the issue untouched and records why in the job summary. It defaults to reporting only, never creates or removes a label, and never touches one a person set.Listed under
integrationssince it lives inside GitHub rather than being a standalone tool. MIT, no dependencies, tests for the decision layer.Need help on this PR? Tag
@codesmith-botwith what you need. Autofix is disabled.Summary by CodeRabbit