Skip to content

refactor wan 2.2 pipeline tests to the new mixin structure#14240

Open
akshan-main wants to merge 1 commit into
huggingface:mainfrom
akshan-main:refactor-wan22-pipeline-tests
Open

refactor wan 2.2 pipeline tests to the new mixin structure#14240
akshan-main wants to merge 1 commit into
huggingface:mainfrom
akshan-main:refactor-wan22-pipeline-tests

Conversation

@akshan-main

@akshan-main akshan-main commented Jul 19, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

What does this PR do?

Refactors the wan 2.2 pipeline tests to the new mixin structure from #14113. The file covers two variants, so it keeps two config/test/memory triads: the 14B Wan22Pipeline (both transformers, boundary_ratio) and the 5B ti2v Wan225BPipeline (expand_timesteps).

Existing coverage is kept for both: test_inference and test_save_load_optional_components (the 14B nulls transformer via boundary_ratio=1.0, the 5B nulls transformer_2). The 5B also keeps its test_components_function and the batch-single tolerance override. No caching tests are added since the old suite had none, and the attention-slicing test is dropped as the new framework has no equivalent.

Before submitting

  • This PR fixes a typo or improves the docs (you can dismiss the other checks if that's the case).
  • Did you read the contributor guideline?
  • Did you read our philosophy doc (important for complex PRs)?
  • Was this discussed/approved via a GitHub issue or the forum? Discussed on Slack with @sayakpaul
  • Did you make sure to update the documentation with your changes?
  • Did you write any new necessary tests?

Who can review?

@sayakpaul

@github-actions github-actions Bot added tests size/L PR with diff > 200 LOC labels Jul 19, 2026
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Hi @akshan-main, thanks for the PR! It does not appear to link an issue it fixes. If this PR addresses an existing issue, please add a closing keyword (e.g. Fixes #1234) to the PR description so the issue is linked. See the contribution guide for more details. If this PR intentionally does not fix a tracked issue, a maintainer can add the no-issue-needed label to silence this reminder.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

size/L PR with diff > 200 LOC tests

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant