docs(citation): add CITATION.cff with the author's ORCID (0000-0002-3078-6652) - #180
Conversation
…078-6652) - CITATION.cff: created https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3078-6652 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01B2ARtAVppZ7x7mVY5u6nAz
|
Navigate logical layers of code changes, visualize relationships, and explore their blast radius. Important Review skippedReview was skipped as selected files did not have any reviewable changes. ⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: ASSERTIVE Plan: Advanced Run ID: You can disable this status message by setting the Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: ASSERTIVE Plan: Advanced Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
Included review availability: This review used your included allowance. Your plan provides up to 1 included review per hour; 0 remain after this review. 📜 Recent review details⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout. (25)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
📝 SummarySummary by CodeRabbit
WalkthroughThis change adds a ChangesCitation metadata
Priority: ⬇️ Low Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~3 minutes Change: Other Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to This change adds a citation record whose project identity and main details align with repository sources. The ORCID and acronym expansion remain inconclusive, but no concrete metadata error is established, so merge risk is minimal. Architecture SummaryArchitecture risk: 🔵 Low · up to The change affects 1 system. Changed systems: Architecture concerns Review detailsSystems and components
Before / after behavior
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. A rabbit finds the citation page, Comment |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Copilot review overview
🟡 Changes recommended
The metadata conflicts with documented authorship and understates prover coverage.
Review effort: Balanced
Findings: 2
Open (2)
What changed in this PR
Adds machine-readable citation metadata, including the author’s ORCID.
Changes:
- Adds project, author, repository, abstract, and keyword metadata.
| File | Description |
|---|---|
CITATION.cff |
Defines citation metadata for the repository. |
💡 Add a code-review agent skill for context-aware, tailored reviews. Learn more in the docs.
…D coverage Follow-up to the estate ORCID rollout (https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3078-6652): - title → the README's project name "Absolute Zero" - abstract: factual correction (see below) Every wording change is taken from this repo's own README or Project.toml. No licence fields or SPDX headers were added or changed. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01B2ARtAVppZ7x7mVY5u6nAz
) Closes #181. **Held for the owner's merge: the merge is the ruling.** #181 asks which author form is canonical. This PR takes the form already in `CITATION.cff` (#180): **Jonathan D.A. Jewell**, ORCID iD `0000-0002-3078-6652`. That matches the 2026-10-01 ORCID-rollout selector ("All ~90 naming you"). If you want "Hyper Polymath" instead, close this PR and the change goes the other way, in `CITATION.cff`. ## Changes - All five citation forms (BibTeX, Harvard, OSCOLA, MLA, APA 7) use the personal name. The ORCID iD is stated once at the top, because BibTeX has no standard ORCID field. - Drops the "See Also" link to `../codemeta.json`, which does not exist in the repo. - `asciidoctor -o /dev/null docs/CITATIONS.adoc` renders clean; `grep -c Polymath` → 0. ## ⚠ Not changed, needs you The BibTeX entry says `license = {AGPL-3.0-or-later}`, while the root `LICENSE` and GitHub's detected licence are **MPL-2.0**. `LICENSES/` also carries `AGPL-3.0-or-later.txt`, so the line may be stale or deliberate, and I cannot tell which. The estate rule is that licence text is never edited by automation, so this line is untouched. Your call: keep it, change it to `{MPL-2.0}`, or delete the field. 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) https://claude.ai/code/session_01WRvDivYwLSeVCJUrfjic3f Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Adds the author's ORCID iD, 0000-0002-3078-6652, to this repo's citation metadata.
Part of an estate-wide rollout. The template's own
0000-0000placeholder is fixed at source in hyperpolymath/rsr-template-repo#214. No licence fields were added or changed.🤖 Generated with Claude Code
https://claude.ai/code/session_01B2ARtAVppZ7x7mVY5u6nAz