docs(type-connections): re-cite the residual receipt at run 35781018563 - #116
Conversation
The hub cited the 2026-09-09 receipt (run 34400282291 at 4325198c). The residual repository's sibling pins are now the current echo-types and epistemic-types heads, and the main run for that merge (35781018563 for 938a7a57) is the receipt whose pins are current. The first receipt is kept as history. Closes the citation half of #115; the Echo->Residual and Epistemic->Residual obligations keep their Phase 3 acceptance. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01QYY8Gp4v4x2J7iSNn1vZ57
|
Navigate logical layers of code changes, visualize relationships, and explore their blast radius. No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: ASSERTIVE Plan: Advanced Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 1 included review per hour; 0 remain after this review. 📜 Recent review details⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout. (12)
🧰 Additional context used📓 Path-based instructions (2)Source excerpt: Source excerpt: Licence **MPL-2.0** + SPDX header on every file (never AGPL).📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (CLAUDE.md) Files:
Source excerpt:📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (.cursorrules) Files:
🔇 Additional comments (1)
📝 SummarySummary by CodeRabbit
WalkthroughThe proof record documentation now references the 22 September 2026 Agda run, its checked commit and environment, and retains the earlier run as the first receipt for the original pins. ChangesProof record documentation
Priority: ⬇️ Low Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~3 minutes Change: Other Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to The proof receipt citations are updated without changing runtime behavior or introducing merge-blocking risk. 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
✅ Passed checks (4 passed)
Full details: Description checkExplanation The description explains the documentation change, references, scope, and known pre-existing failures. It does not use the required template sections and omits the RSR Quality Checklist, an explicit Testing section, and Screenshots information. Resolution Rewrite the description using the repository template. Add Summary, Changes, RSR Quality Checklist, Testing, and Screenshots sections. Mark each checklist item as applicable or not applicable, and state how the documentation-only change was checked.
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. A rabbit checks the proof trail bright Comment ✨ Finishing Touches 💡 1🛠️ Fix failing CI checks 💡
|
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
1 participant
Re-cites the residual-evidence-types receipt in
docs/TYPE-CONNECTIONS.adoc: the proof-record link now points at PROOF-STATUS on residualmain(7ffd4d25a4f3) and the hosted-run link at run 35781018563, themainrun for the merge of residual PR #7 (938a7a57), whose sibling pins are the currentecho-types(9c4b72b5) andepistemic-types(dd948fbd) heads. The 2026-09-09 receipt (run 34400282291) is kept as history. Docs only.Refs #115 (citation half; the obligations' Phase 3 acceptance stays open).
Pre-existing reds on
mainat1fa506c8, untouched here:Static Analysis GateandWell-Known Standards (RFC 9116 + RSR)(triage: #117).🤖 Generated with Claude Code
https://claude.ai/code/session_01QYY8Gp4v4x2J7iSNn1vZ57