Repository navigation
vim9script, functions calls without :call #78
Description
Describe the bug
Using a function as intended in vim9script, without :call will result in E492: Not an editor command:
To Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:
vim9script
def Foo():
echom "done"
enddef
foo() # E92: Not an editor command: fooExpected behavior
Resolving vim9 functions.
Reacted by Craig E. Shea, Andrei Tihonovschi, scotts777, hippie68 and C.D. MacEachern
Activity
chemzqm commentedon Aug 13, 2022
@iamcco please consider adding support for vim9.
iamcco commentedon Oct 11, 2022
It need vim-vimlparser to support vim9.
igbanam commentedon Oct 20, 2022
How do I setup the support for vim9 with vim-vimlparser?
Screen.Recording.2022-10-20.at.09.42.17.mov
igbanam commentedon Oct 20, 2022
For context, I'm using vim-language-server through yegappan/lsp
iamcco commentedon Nov 12, 2022
What I mean is vim-language-server depend on vim-vimlparser to support vim9 and by now vim-vimlparser does not support vim9.
plug: remove coc-vimlsp
jclsn commentedon May 13, 2026
@iamcco There seems to be a PR now. The vimlparser maintainers haven't looked at it still. Maybe want to give the patched
vimlparser.jsa try?vim-jp/vim-vimlparser#205
sideshowbarker commentedon May 15, 2026
The changes from that PR have now been merged into the vim-vimlparser sources: vim-jp/vim-vimlparser@075a4fa.
Aster89 commentedon Aug 27, 2026
Any news, @iamcco ?