Skip to content

docs: expand the testing guide with frontend commands#9294

Open
wunianze666-netizen wants to merge 2 commits into
invoke-ai:mainfrom
wunianze666-netizen:docs/expand-testing-guide
Open

docs: expand the testing guide with frontend commands#9294
wunianze666-netizen wants to merge 2 commits into
invoke-ai:mainfrom
wunianze666-netizen:docs/expand-testing-guide

Conversation

@wunianze666-netizen

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

  • replace the unfinished frontend testing TODO with concrete Vitest commands
  • document how to run the frontend tests from the repo root or from invokeai/frontend/web
  • replace the aspirational backend organization note with a clearer description of the current state

Why

The testing guide currently exposes an unfinished TODO in the published docs. This change makes the page immediately usable for contributors who want to run frontend tests locally.

@github-actions github-actions Bot added the docs PRs that change docs label Jun 18, 2026
@lstein lstein requested a review from joshistoast July 10, 2026 01:57
@lstein lstein added the 6.14.x label Jul 10, 2026
@lstein lstein moved this to 6.14.x Theme: USER EXPERIENCE in Invoke - Community Roadmap Jul 10, 2026

@joshistoast joshistoast left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Reviewing from my phone rn, this looks fairly above board. A couple non-blockers I'd probably change though:

  1. Not sure it's worth talking about where to expect the test files and then afterwards say that a lot don't follow that expectation.

  2. Maybe we can mention the makefile commands we have for running the testing suite. Either as an additional set of commands or replace the mentioned ones.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

6.14.x docs PRs that change docs

Projects

Status: 6.14.x Theme: USER EXPERIENCE

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants