Do not fail step in case commit is not found (422) - #12
Open
jglick wants to merge 6 commits into
Open
Conversation
…tep-plugin into robustness
Member
Author
|
I extended the fix to also cover some cases I have observed where a transient GitHub outage affecting only commit status operations was causing builds to fail, which it should not I think. |
Member
Author
|
@raul-arabaolaza needs to be labelled |
Member
Author
|
@raul-arabaolaza is this plugin still in use? If not, PRs should be closed and it should be archived I guess? |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Saw a build fail because it was using this step on a merge commit from a PR, which does not exist remotely. That seems like overkill—notification to GitHub should be a best effort.
The API docs as usual do not document return codes; GitHub staff has told me in the past that they should be obvious. They are not, but 422 is at least documented for “invalid fields”.