chore(pyproject.toml): from setuptools to uv_build as build backend#171
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
chore(pyproject.toml): from setuptools to uv_build as build backend
Why the pull request was made
As our lib is a pure-python package and expose only standard PEP 621 metadata, and doesn't implement any custom
setuptoolsbuild logic, we can useuv_buildas a build backend instead ofsetuptoolsto have a faster and less-configuration build backend. It is also benefic to align the build backend with the existinguv-based workflow.Summary of changes
setuptoolsbyuv_buildas build backendMANIFEST.in, that is now uselessScreenshots (if appropriate):
Not applicable.
How has this been tested?
By testing a build and checking what is in the tar and the wheel.
Resources
Not applicable.
Types of changes
Checklist