fix: resolve BDSM Singles browser challenge - #520
Open
kristoisberg wants to merge 2 commits into
Open
Conversation
Collaborator
|
There's a conflict, but LGTM |
Owner
Collaborator
|
@kristoisberg can you verify if main works for you and close this if not needed? |
# Conflicts: # user_scanner/user_scan/adult/bdsmsingles.py
Collaborator
Author
|
I resolved the merge conflicts. @brunolm I re-added the check for a 302 error code, interpreting it as an available username. The comment in your patch described two different scenarios where a 302 error code could occur (available username and browser challenge), this PR resolves the latter, only keeping available username as a (known) option. Thoughts? |
brunolm
approved these changes
Aug 12, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
BDSM Singles has introduced a browser challenge, which caused the username module to fail. This PR solves the challenge to make the module work again.
PS: Could be another regional thing. If the module previously worked for any of you, and this PR broke something, please let me know.