Node 20 is deprecated

[MRK2009]

https://github.blog/changelog/2025-09-19-deprecation-of-node-20-on-github-actions-runners/

[krdlab]

Hi @MRK2009, thanks for the PR, and for also updating actions/setup-node in 7529261.

A couple of notes on how I'll merge this:

• Merge strategy: To keep the upstream-sync merge commits out of master, I'll squash-merge this PR into a single commit covering both action.yml and .github/workflows/test.yml. You'll still be credited as the author of the squashed commit.
• Remaining follow-ups: Nothing else is needed from your side for this PR. I'll handle the remaining Node 24 follow-ups (.node-version, engines.node, @types/node, and a regenerated dist/) on my side after this is merged.

Thanks again for the contribution!

[MRK2009]

Hi @MRK2009, thanks for the PR, and for also updating actions/setup-node in 7529261.

A couple of notes on how I'll merge this:

• Merge strategy: To keep the upstream-sync merge commits out of master, I'll squash-merge this PR into a single commit covering both action.yml and .github/workflows/test.yml. You'll still be credited as the author of the squashed commit.
• Remaining follow-ups: Nothing else is needed from your side for this PR. I'll handle the remaining Node 24 follow-ups (.node-version, engines.node, @types/node, and a regenerated dist/) on my side after this is merged.

Thanks again for the contribution!

I'll see, when I have time.
But your welcome

[krdlab]

Looks like our messages crossed — no worries!

For future commits, descriptive subjects such as chore: bump actions/setup-node to v5 make the history easier to scan later. I'll update the squash subject when merging this PR.

Thanks again!

[MRK2009]

Yeah, my commit names are based of my expression of what am I doing right/wrong rather than make them very descriptive of what am I actually doing sometimes.

Also I didn't read you're first message in my pr, because I was too focused on fix the node version deprecation until I checked it.

And I've bumped the actions/setup-node once again, because there is pr(#96) which will conflict my pr, when I have v5.0.0 instead of 6.4.0, so yeah.

Your welcome again.