docs(observability): inventory component coverage - #504
Open
tucktuck101 wants to merge 2 commits into
Open
Conversation
Signed-off-by: tucktuck101 <jeffreytaylorrobertson@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: tucktuck101 <jeffreytaylorrobertson@gmail.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Adds an 80-row canonical component inventory with stable IDs, assessment owners, pinned evidence, and explicit product boundaries. It now distinguishes pending assessment work from evidence-backed bounded unknowns, preserving PRD #289's epistemic states while making stage-1 progress truthful. Current-state navigation identifies the matrix as the coverage and assessment-progress record while preserving mobile and infrastructure exclusions.
Related issue
Closes #462
Issue type
Task
Agent provenance
gpt-5.6-solObjective
Create the canonical non-mobile Buzz component coverage matrix and make it the linked stage-1 coverage and assessment-progress record.
Impacted components
Approach and rejected alternatives
The matrix gives each product boundary a stable ID and one assessment owner, then uses separate reconciliation registers for enumerable repository surfaces. Source registration proves coverage and ownership, not component-level runtime evidence, so incomplete work is
Pending assessment; only a completed assessment may produceAssessed, a specifically evidencedBounded unknown, orExcluded.Rejected using
Bounded unknownas a synonym for work not yet performed because PRD #289 explicitly distinguishes an examined-but-unresolved property from an unexamined component. Rejected a one-row-per-crate inventory because relay and desktop packages host many independently diagnosable boundaries; shared libraries remain assigned through consuming runtimes unless they own a distinct diagnostic or export seam.Verification
Command run:
Raw output:
Not verified
No relay, desktop, browser, ACP, MCP, CLI, worker, adapter, or subprocess workflow was run; issue #462 inventories and assigns those components while issues #463-#476 own their current-state assessments. No deployed collection or infrastructure system was inspected, and no mobile internals were assessed. The
admin-webbundle was verified from source and release packaging but not exercised in a browser.Security implications
No runtime behavior or exposure changes. The documentation records security-sensitive diagnostic boundaries and keeps dependency internals, mobile, and post-export infrastructure outside the product-instrumentation scope; inspection found no credential values or private hostnames added by this diff.
Escalations
The original #462 definition of done used
Bounded unknownfor not-yet-performed assessments, conflicting with PRD #289. The issue contract and this matrix are corrected to use transitionalPending assessment; Gate 2 must reduce that count to zero from evidence produced by #463-#476. Separately, #457-#460 were merged before their recorded predecessors completed; that orchestration deviation remains for the human Gate 1 review and is not silently resolved in this inventory PR.