chore: upgrade Vite 8.0.11, Vitest 5.0.0-beta.2

[react-server-bot]

Automated daily upgrade of Vite, Rolldown, and/or Vitest to the latest available versions.

Vite: 8.0.10 → 8.0.11
Vitest: 5.0.0-beta.1 → 5.0.0-beta.2

Updated locations

• packages/react-server/package.json — vite, rolldown
• test/package.json — vite, rolldown, vitest, @vitest/ui
• packages/rsc/package.json — vitest, @vitest/*
• packages/create-react-server/test/package.json — vitest
• package.json — all pnpm.overrides for Vite
• pnpm-lock.yaml

Smoke test

• Dev mode — hello world test passed ✅
• Build+start mode — hello world test passed ✅

[github-actions]

⚡ Flight Protocol Benchmark

Commit: cbcce56

Serialization (renderToReadableStream)

Scenario	@lazarv/rsc	webpack	vs webpack
react: minimal element	230.9K	29.4K	🟢 +684.3%
react: shallow wide (1000)	2.3K	357	🟢 +536.0%
react: deep nested (100)	17.4K	5.8K	🟢 +197.8%
react: product list (50)	5.6K	2.0K	🟢 +180.4%
react: large table (500x10)	287	90	🟢 +218.2%
data: primitives	183.0K	39.0K	🟢 +368.9%
data: large string (100KB)	7.1K	6.9K	🟢 +2.1%
data: nested objects (20)	57.0K	26.9K	🟢 +112.1%
data: large array (10K)	118	111	🟢 +6.2%
data: Map & Set	10.6K	5.7K	🟢 +86.7%
data: Date/BigInt/Symbol	167.9K	36.0K	🟢 +366.5%
data: typed arrays	32.6K	12.9K	🟢 +152.3%
data: mixed payload	8.2K	4.1K	🟢 +99.7%

Prerender (prerender)

Scenario	@lazarv/rsc ops/s	mean
react: minimal element	251.9K	4.0 µs
react: shallow wide (1000)	2.0K	488.1 µs
react: deep nested (100)	16.3K	61.5 µs
react: product list (50)	5.9K	168.2 µs
react: large table (500x10)	260	3.85 ms
data: primitives	196.9K	5.1 µs
data: large string (100KB)	689	1.45 ms
data: nested objects (20)	59.4K	16.8 µs
data: large array (10K)	119	8.39 ms
data: Map & Set	11.3K	88.4 µs
data: Date/BigInt/Symbol	189.3K	5.3 µs
data: typed arrays	685	1.46 ms
data: mixed payload	7.7K	129.9 µs

Deserialization (createFromReadableStream)

Scenario	@lazarv/rsc	webpack	vs webpack
react: minimal element	168.9K	134.7K	🟢 +25.4%
react: shallow wide (1000)	23.1K	1.6K	🟢 +1348.0%
react: deep nested (100)	102.8K	18.8K	🟢 +447.5%
react: product list (50)	54.3K	13.0K	🟢 +318.8%
react: large table (500x10)	4.1K	2.3K	🟢 +81.8%
data: primitives	142.0K	130.2K	🟢 +9.1%
data: large string (100KB)	40.3K	36.7K	🟢 +9.8%
data: nested objects (20)	82.7K	70.1K	🟢 +18.0%
data: large array (10K)	286	251	🟢 +14.3%
data: Map & Set	16.6K	14.9K	🟢 +12.0%
data: Date/BigInt/Symbol	138.6K	111.2K	🟢 +24.7%
data: typed arrays	63.7K	43.8K	🟢 +45.3%
data: mixed payload	25.9K	15.1K	🟢 +72.0%

Roundtrip (serialize + deserialize)

Scenario	@lazarv/rsc	webpack	vs webpack
react: minimal element	106.1K	22.1K	🟢 +379.5%
react: shallow wide (1000)	1.7K	291	🟢 +475.2%
react: deep nested (100)	14.3K	4.3K	🟢 +229.3%
react: product list (50)	5.4K	1.7K	🟢 +217.9%
react: large table (500x10)	264	87	🟢 +202.9%
data: primitives	83.2K	29.4K	🟢 +182.9%
data: large string (100KB)	6.8K	6.7K	🟢 +2.3%
data: nested objects (20)	34.4K	18.5K	🟢 +85.9%
data: large array (10K)	83	76	🟢 +9.6%
data: Map & Set	6.2K	3.9K	🟢 +60.9%
data: Date/BigInt/Symbol	71.9K	23.8K	🟢 +202.2%
data: typed arrays	26.3K	11.9K	🟢 +120.8%
data: mixed payload	6.0K	3.1K	🟢 +93.1%

Legend & methodology

Indicators: 🟢 > 1% faster | 🔴 > 1% slower | ⚪ within noise margin

vs webpack: compares @lazarv/rsc against react-server-dom-webpack within the same run.
vs baseline: compares @lazarv/rsc against the previous main branch run.

Values shown are operations/second (higher is better). Each scenario runs for at least 100 iterations with warmup.

Benchmarks run on GitHub Actions runners (shared infrastructure) — expect ~5% variance between runs. Consistent directional changes across multiple scenarios are more meaningful than any single number.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
⚠️ Please upload report for BASE (main@5c82f1c). Learn more about missing BASE report.
✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #418   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage        ?   91.97%           
=======================================
  Files           ?        3           
  Lines           ?     3591           
  Branches        ?     1174           
=======================================
  Hits            ?     3303           
  Misses          ?      288           
  Partials        ?        0           

Flag	Coverage Δ
rsc	91.97% <ø> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[github-actions]

⚡ Benchmark Results

	PR bd308ad	main 675fbba
Config	50 connections, 10s/test	50 connections, 10s/test

Benchmark	Req/s	vs main	Avg Latency	vs main	P99 Latency	Throughput
minimal	1140	🔴 -5.5%	43.16 ms	🔴 +5.9%	98 ms	0.8 MB/s
small	1281	🟢 +4.6%	38.39 ms	🟢 -4.3%	67 ms	1.3 MB/s
medium	390	🟢 +1.7%	126.86 ms	🟢 -1.6%	172 ms	5.8 MB/s
large	46	⚪ -0.2%	1017.9 ms	🟢 -2.2%	2242 ms	4.7 MB/s
deep	889	🟢 +11.3%	55.54 ms	🟢 -10.2%	87 ms	3.1 MB/s
wide	72	🟢 +6.8%	681.89 ms	🟢 -3.4%	1254 ms	3.9 MB/s
cached	3288	🟢 +8.7%	14.71 ms	🟢 -8.0%	29 ms	48.5 MB/s
client-min	431	⚪ -0.9%	114.7 ms	🔴 +1.1%	180 ms	1.9 MB/s
client-small	466	⚪ -0.9%	106.03 ms	🔴 +1.1%	160 ms	2.2 MB/s
client-med	347	🟢 +1.0%	141.45 ms	🟢 -1.5%	213 ms	6.4 MB/s
client-large	78	🔴 -9.3%	601.53 ms	🔴 +7.0%	1080 ms	8.1 MB/s
client-deep	420	🔴 -3.6%	117.07 ms	🔴 +3.9%	173 ms	3.0 MB/s
client-wide	138	⚪ -0.7%	358.84 ms	🔴 +2.9%	673 ms	8.1 MB/s
rsc-client-large	1023	🔴 -5.3%	48.17 ms	🔴 +5.7%	68 ms	2.7 MB/s
rsc-client-wide	1073	⚪ -0.9%	45.92 ms	⚪ +0.8%	68 ms	2.8 MB/s
static-json	6925	🔴 -5.6%	6.81 ms	🔴 +7.2%	17 ms	2.9 MB/s
static-js	6675	🔴 -7.1%	7.04 ms	🔴 +8.8%	17 ms	8.4 MB/s
404-miss	4778	⚪ +0.6%	9.89 ms	⚪ -0.7%	24 ms	0.6 MB/s
hybrid-min	448	🟢 +2.8%	110.52 ms	🟢 -2.4%	177 ms	2.2 MB/s
hybrid-small	433	🟢 +3.8%	113.77 ms	🟢 -4.0%	166 ms	2.6 MB/s
hybrid-medium	237	🟢 +2.3%	207.97 ms	🟢 -2.8%	298 ms	10.1 MB/s
hybrid-large	41	🔴 -1.9%	1123.5 ms	⚪ -0.8%	1808 ms	13.3 MB/s
hybrid-deep	357	⚪ +0.8%	138.24 ms	🟢 -1.3%	202 ms	4.9 MB/s
hybrid-wide	64	🟢 +4.3%	774.95 ms	🟢 -2.2%	1479 ms	12.5 MB/s
hybrid-cached	2902	🔴 -1.9%	16.63 ms	🔴 +1.5%	32 ms	123.7 MB/s
hybrid-client-min	482	🟢 +2.0%	102.86 ms	🟢 -1.4%	155 ms	2.2 MB/s
hybrid-client-small	457	🔴 -3.0%	107.9 ms	🔴 +2.8%	159 ms	2.2 MB/s
hybrid-client-medium	345	🔴 -1.2%	142.73 ms	⚪ +0.7%	221 ms	6.4 MB/s
hybrid-client-large	82	🟢 +3.7%	598.41 ms	⚪ -0.9%	1126 ms	8.6 MB/s
hybrid-client-deep	432	⚪ +0.4%	114.79 ms	⚪ +0.5%	182 ms	3.1 MB/s
hybrid-client-wide	139	⚪ +0.1%	352.35 ms	⚪ -0.9%	627 ms	8.2 MB/s

Legend

🟢 > 1% improvement | 🔴 > 1% regression | ⚪ within noise margin

Benchmarks run on GitHub Actions runners (shared infrastructure) — expect ~5% variance between runs. Consistent directional changes across multiple routes are more meaningful than any single number.