chore: upgrade Vite 8.0.12

[react-server-bot]

Automated daily upgrade of Vite, Rolldown, and/or Vitest to the latest available versions.

Vite: 8.0.11 → 8.0.12

Updated locations

• packages/react-server/package.json — vite, rolldown
• test/package.json — vite, rolldown, vitest, @vitest/ui
• packages/rsc/package.json — vitest, @vitest/*
• packages/create-react-server/test/package.json — vitest
• package.json — all pnpm.overrides for Vite
• pnpm-lock.yaml

Smoke test

• Dev mode — hello world test passed ✅
• Build+start mode — hello world test passed ✅

[github-actions]

⚡ Flight Protocol Benchmark

Commit: 122148d

Serialization (renderToReadableStream)

Scenario	@lazarv/rsc	webpack	vs webpack
react: minimal element	223.6K	29.1K	🟢 +669.2%
react: shallow wide (1000)	2.2K	340	🟢 +546.1%
react: deep nested (100)	17.3K	5.8K	🟢 +197.1%
react: product list (50)	6.1K	2.0K	🟢 +204.8%
react: large table (500x10)	281	89	🟢 +217.6%
data: primitives	177.0K	39.8K	🟢 +345.2%
data: large string (100KB)	7.2K	6.9K	🟢 +4.5%
data: nested objects (20)	58.0K	26.1K	🟢 +121.9%
data: large array (10K)	115	111	🟢 +4.1%
data: Map & Set	11.0K	5.5K	🟢 +101.5%
data: Date/BigInt/Symbol	167.4K	31.5K	🟢 +431.2%
data: typed arrays	30.9K	12.9K	🟢 +140.2%
data: mixed payload	8.2K	3.9K	🟢 +110.0%

Prerender (prerender)

Scenario	@lazarv/rsc ops/s	mean
react: minimal element	259.3K	3.9 µs
react: shallow wide (1000)	2.0K	496.0 µs
react: deep nested (100)	16.1K	62.0 µs
react: product list (50)	5.8K	171.4 µs
react: large table (500x10)	273	3.66 ms
data: primitives	195.0K	5.1 µs
data: large string (100KB)	687	1.46 ms
data: nested objects (20)	58.5K	17.1 µs
data: large array (10K)	117	8.56 ms
data: Map & Set	11.3K	88.5 µs
data: Date/BigInt/Symbol	185.5K	5.4 µs
data: typed arrays	668	1.50 ms
data: mixed payload	7.7K	129.9 µs

Deserialization (createFromReadableStream)

Scenario	@lazarv/rsc	webpack	vs webpack
react: minimal element	173.3K	138.0K	🟢 +25.6%
react: shallow wide (1000)	21.3K	1.9K	🟢 +995.4%
react: deep nested (100)	98.6K	19.3K	🟢 +411.1%
react: product list (50)	49.9K	14.5K	🟢 +244.4%
react: large table (500x10)	4.2K	2.1K	🟢 +102.2%
data: primitives	139.8K	129.8K	🟢 +7.7%
data: large string (100KB)	40.7K	31.0K	🟢 +31.1%
data: nested objects (20)	86.9K	70.8K	🟢 +22.8%
data: large array (10K)	286	253	🟢 +12.9%
data: Map & Set	16.4K	14.6K	🟢 +12.6%
data: Date/BigInt/Symbol	134.6K	107.7K	🟢 +25.0%
data: typed arrays	59.9K	43.6K	🟢 +37.6%
data: mixed payload	25.8K	14.6K	🟢 +76.1%

Roundtrip (serialize + deserialize)

Scenario	@lazarv/rsc	webpack	vs webpack
react: minimal element	105.3K	22.5K	🟢 +368.8%
react: shallow wide (1000)	1.7K	295	🟢 +478.9%
react: deep nested (100)	14.6K	4.4K	🟢 +231.0%
react: product list (50)	5.2K	1.7K	🟢 +198.7%
react: large table (500x10)	260	90	🟢 +190.4%
data: primitives	84.3K	31.0K	🟢 +171.7%
data: large string (100KB)	6.0K	6.5K	🔴 -8.6%
data: nested objects (20)	33.6K	18.8K	🟢 +78.5%
data: large array (10K)	83	76	🟢 +9.7%
data: Map & Set	6.4K	4.0K	🟢 +60.3%
data: Date/BigInt/Symbol	73.0K	23.6K	🟢 +208.7%
data: typed arrays	25.8K	11.0K	🟢 +134.5%
data: mixed payload	5.9K	2.9K	🟢 +102.8%

Legend & methodology

Indicators: 🟢 > 1% faster | 🔴 > 1% slower | ⚪ within noise margin

vs webpack: compares @lazarv/rsc against react-server-dom-webpack within the same run.
vs baseline: compares @lazarv/rsc against the previous main branch run.

Values shown are operations/second (higher is better). Each scenario runs for at least 100 iterations with warmup.

Benchmarks run on GitHub Actions runners (shared infrastructure) — expect ~5% variance between runs. Consistent directional changes across multiple scenarios are more meaningful than any single number.

[codecov-commenter]

❌ 5 Tests Failed:

Tests completed	Failed	Passed	Skipped
1085	5	1080	6

View the top 3 failed test(s) by shortest run time

__test__/deno.spec.mjs > create-react-server: deno runtime (pnpm) > preset: nextjs > starts in production mode

Stack Traces | 0.000756s run time

AssertionError: production start should work: expected false to be true // Object.is equality

- Expected
+ Received

- true
+ false

 ❯ __test__/deno.spec.mjs:74:66

__test__/deno.spec.mjs > create-react-server: deno runtime (pnpm) > preset: blank > starts in production mode

Stack Traces | 0.000896s run time

AssertionError: production start should work: expected false to be true // Object.is equality

- Expected
+ Received

- true
+ false

 ❯ __test__/deno.spec.mjs:74:66

__test__/deno.spec.mjs > create-react-server: deno runtime (pnpm) > preset: nextjs > builds the app

Stack Traces | 0.000959s run time

AssertionError: build should succeed: expected false to be true // Object.is equality

- Expected
+ Received

- true
+ false

 ❯ __test__/deno.spec.mjs:70:58

__test__/deno.spec.mjs > create-react-server: deno runtime (pnpm) > preset: blank > builds the app

Stack Traces | 0.0027s run time

AssertionError: build should succeed: expected false to be true // Object.is equality

- Expected
+ Received

- true
+ false

 ❯ __test__/deno.spec.mjs:70:58

__test__/deno.spec.mjs > create-react-server: deno runtime (pnpm) > preset: blank > dev mode starts and serves the app

Stack Traces | 0.0081s run time

AssertionError: dev mode should work: expected false to be true // Object.is equality

- Expected
+ Received

- true
+ false

 ❯ __test__/deno.spec.mjs:66:56

__test__/apps/docs.spec.mjs > docs load

Stack Traces | 168s run time

TimeoutError: page.goto: Timeout 30000ms exceeded.
Call log:
  - navigating to "http://localhost:49931/", waiting until "load"

 ❯ __test__/apps/docs.spec.mjs:11:16

To view more test analytics, go to the Test Analytics Dashboard
_{📋 Got 3 mins? Take this short survey to help us improve Test Analytics.}

[github-actions]

⚡ Benchmark Results

	PR d1ead72	main a345961
Config	50 connections, 10s/test	50 connections, 10s/test

Benchmark	Req/s	vs main	Avg Latency	vs main	P99 Latency	Throughput
minimal	1178	🔴 -24.4%	41.78 ms	🔴 +32.6%	84 ms	0.8 MB/s
small	1223	🔴 -21.4%	40.16 ms	🔴 +27.4%	69 ms	1.2 MB/s
medium	373	🔴 -9.4%	132.06 ms	🔴 +10.4%	178 ms	5.5 MB/s
large	45	🔴 -8.1%	1047.08 ms	🔴 +6.9%	1792 ms	4.5 MB/s
deep	890	🔴 -8.5%	55.43 ms	🔴 +9.5%	90 ms	3.0 MB/s
wide	69	🟢 +3.0%	702.76 ms	🟢 -2.3%	1287 ms	3.8 MB/s
cached	3274	🔴 -21.2%	14.73 ms	🔴 +28.1%	29 ms	48.1 MB/s
client-min	438	🔴 -23.0%	113.22 ms	🔴 +30.1%	177 ms	1.9 MB/s
client-small	442	🔴 -23.6%	111.31 ms	🔴 +30.3%	168 ms	2.0 MB/s
client-med	342	🔴 -12.2%	144.34 ms	🔴 +14.8%	210 ms	6.3 MB/s
client-large	75	🔴 -10.3%	632.89 ms	🔴 +11.0%	1243 ms	7.9 MB/s
client-deep	431	🔴 -17.9%	114.4 ms	🔴 +21.3%	162 ms	3.0 MB/s
client-wide	135	🔴 -2.2%	366.14 ms	🔴 +3.1%	684 ms	7.9 MB/s
rsc-client-large	1052	🔴 -17.3%	46.82 ms	🔴 +21.0%	68 ms	2.7 MB/s
rsc-client-wide	1074	🔴 -15.5%	45.87 ms	🔴 +18.6%	71 ms	2.7 MB/s
static-json	6722	🔴 -40.8%	6.94 ms	🔴 +88.6%	17 ms	2.8 MB/s
static-js	6814	🔴 -38.6%	6.82 ms	🔴 +79.0%	16 ms	8.5 MB/s
404-miss	4672	🔴 -29.1%	10.23 ms	🔴 +47.8%	24 ms	0.6 MB/s
hybrid-min	445	🔴 -21.0%	110.74 ms	🔴 +26.3%	177 ms	2.1 MB/s
hybrid-small	430	🔴 -19.0%	114.68 ms	🔴 +23.3%	174 ms	2.5 MB/s
hybrid-medium	219	🔴 -14.2%	222.73 ms	🔴 +15.6%	315 ms	9.3 MB/s
hybrid-large	41	🔴 -1.2%	1186.55 ms	🔴 +5.8%	1990 ms	13.3 MB/s
hybrid-deep	346	🔴 -15.7%	142.08 ms	🔴 +17.9%	203 ms	4.7 MB/s
hybrid-wide	64	🟢 +4.2%	771.67 ms	⚪ -0.9%	1511 ms	12.6 MB/s
hybrid-cached	2934	🔴 -11.5%	16.51 ms	🔴 +13.8%	32 ms	124.6 MB/s
hybrid-client-min	480	🔴 -18.5%	103 ms	🔴 +23.0%	146 ms	2.1 MB/s
hybrid-client-small	444	🔴 -23.7%	111.12 ms	🔴 +30.8%	158 ms	2.1 MB/s
hybrid-client-medium	359	🔴 -11.2%	138.02 ms	🔴 +13.6%	212 ms	6.7 MB/s
hybrid-client-large	79	⚪ -1.0%	614.34 ms	🔴 +1.9%	1149 ms	8.3 MB/s
hybrid-client-deep	431	🔴 -16.5%	114.8 ms	🔴 +20.1%	161 ms	3.1 MB/s
hybrid-client-wide	133	🔴 -1.5%	370.98 ms	🔴 +1.2%	675 ms	7.8 MB/s

Legend

🟢 > 1% improvement | 🔴 > 1% regression | ⚪ within noise margin

Benchmarks run on GitHub Actions runners (shared infrastructure) — expect ~5% variance between runs. Consistent directional changes across multiple routes are more meaningful than any single number.