You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository was archived by the owner on Jan 7, 2024. It is now read-only.
Repository navigation
This repository was archived by the owner on Jan 7, 2024. It is now read-only.
[BUG] Wrong Java memory options in 169 release #168
Invalid maximum heap size: -Xmx1024MM
Error: Could not create the Java Virtual Machine.
Error: A fatal exception has occurred. Program will exit.
Expected Behavior
No response
Steps To Reproduce
Upgrade from 168 to 169
Environment
- OS: manjaro/archlinux ARM64
- How docker service was installed:
k3s
CPU architecture
arm64
Docker creation
Kubernetes deployment
Container logs
This message apears in a loop:
Invalid maximum heap size: -Xmx1024MM
Error: Could not create the Java Virtual Machine.
Error: A fatal exception has occurred. Program will exit.
This behaviour, and the documentation, was changed a year ago in #119 , the most recent update removed the compatibility shim in place to handle the transition.
If you update your environment variables as per the readme it will work.
Reacted by amiga23, Bryan, Mickroz, b-col and Jason Plum
Activity
github-actions commentedon Nov 29, 2022
Thanks for opening your first issue here! Be sure to follow the bug or feature issue templates!
amiga23 commentedon Nov 29, 2022
Parameter needs to be set without M now
MEM_LIMIT=1024M -> MEM_LIMIT=1024
thespad commentedon Nov 29, 2022
This behaviour, and the documentation, was changed a year ago in #119 , the most recent update removed the compatibility shim in place to handle the transition.
If you update your environment variables as per the readme it will work.
ints99 commentedon Feb 3, 2023
Why this is closed? The same issue is still not fixed?
Roxedus commentedon Feb 3, 2023
There is nothing to fix, you need to alter your deployment according to our documentation.
ints99 commentedon Feb 3, 2023
Ok, thanks, now I see the solution! Thnx!