Repository navigation
fix(adr): correct a false claim in ADR 0048 about shipped executables - #34
Merged
Merged
Conversation
ADR 0048 said the refused hook would have been the first executable the plugin ever generates. It would not: loop/run-loop.sh is generated, chmod +x, when the loop scaffolding is opted into, and has been since v1.6. The check behind the claim ran ls on one directory level while the claim was about the whole plugin. Same guard as the 2026-09-21 drift entry — ask what the evidence does not cover — which did not fire, because a command you ran yourself feels like verification in a way a peer's does not. Logged there as a recurrence. The decision does not move, and the corrected distinction is sharper: run-loop.sh is a runner the user invokes, opt-in and capped, where a SessionStart hook runs unasked on every session of every bootstrapped project. That is the class ADR 0025 refused. See CHANGELOG [Unreleased] > Added.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
ADR 0048 shipped an hour ago with a false statement. Correcting it, and logging how it got in.
The claim
It would have been the first executable the plugin ever generated. Verified: no
.sh, no hook, nothing runtime in any template today.False.
skills/bootstrap/templates/loop/run-loop.shis generated,chmod +x, whenever the loop scaffolding is opted into — and has been since v1.6.How it got in
The check was
ls skills/bootstrap/templates/ | grep '\.sh$'. It listed one directory level; the claim was about the whole plugin.templates/loop/was never looked at.That is the guard from the 2026-09-21 drift entry — ask what the evidence does not cover, and check that instead — failing on a new vector. There, the evidence came from a peer and the inference was borrowed. Here I produced the evidence myself, which is precisely why it did not fire: a command you ran yourself feels like verification in a way a peer's does not. Logged as a recurrence on that entry rather than as a new one, per ADR 0043.
The decision does not move, and the argument gets better
run-loop.shis a runner the user invokes — opt-in, with a hard iteration ceiling, and nothing happens until someone types it. ASessionStarthook runs unasked, in the agent's startup path, on every session of every bootstrapped project.That is the class ADR 0025 refused, and it is a sharper line than no executables ever was — which was both false and the wrong test.