Skip to content

docs: repair GOOSE handoff and preserve exact RCB report authority acceptance - #204

Closed
masarray wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
docs/workbench-report-identity-handoff-20261017
Closed

masarray wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
docs/workbench-report-identity-handoff-20261017

Conversation

@masarray

@masarray masarray commented Oct 16, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Documentation-only accepted native Workbench handoff after merged PR #203 (a33271e90fea369abad551e7601b446752e10d54). Records 13/13 exact-head source workflows success including 55/55 Qt steps, GCC/Clang/MSVC, sanitizers, MMS interop/RCB; RptID/DataRef/ConfRev/DataSet exact binding, GI read/write separation, static dataset pinning, and outstanding physical manufacturer acceptance.

Also repairs a malformed GOOSE handoff sentence from PR #201 that accidentally embedded the document header inside the typed $GO$ name. This branch changes only docs/WORKBENCH_CURRENT_HANDOFF.md; no source/installer/firmware changes.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Oct 16, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-10-16T22:50:45.637778Z 64f72a0 PR opened
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

Superseded by merged PR #205 at 6797ef53f0220077bf80388f8df8dfa08a9f8d88. Verified current main already documents accepted Reporting/RCB PR #203 with exact-head 13/13 green + native Qt 55/55, fixes the malformed GOOSE $GO$ handoff, and retains physical acceptance gates. PR #204 is a redundant, now-conflicting documentation branch; closing instead of overwriting the newer consolidated handoff. No product functionality or documentation lost.

@masarray masarray closed this Oct 16, 2026

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 64f72a0205

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread docs/WORKBENCH_CURRENT_HANDOFF.md Outdated

## P0 exact RCB InformationReport authority — 2026-10-17 (WIB)

- **Implementation PR:** [#203](https://github.com/masarray/arstack61850/pull/203), native Qt Workbench + reusable C++ MMS engine; source changes present on PR, **merge and field acceptance pending CI** at this checkpoint. Refresh its exact head, 13 workflow results, review threads, and main before treating this as accepted.

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Retire the superseded Reporting milestone

Once this checkpoint says PR #203 already contains the Reporting/RCB implementation, the still-current “Next milestone candidates” entry on line 25 continues to direct the next owner to implement static URCB/BRCB real-frame mapping. Following both instructions could duplicate the pending source work; replace that candidate with completion/verification of #203 or explicitly mark it superseded.

AGENTS.md reference: AGENTS.md:L242-L245

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant