Skip to content

Workbench field UX: truthful GI evidence and exact RCB member-selection identity - #211

Merged
masarray merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
fix/workbench-report-gi-evidence-20261017
Oct 17, 2026
Merged

masarray merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
fix/workbench-report-gi-evidence-20261017

Conversation

@masarray

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Native Qt Workbench field-use hardening after merged Reporting/RCB #203 and GUI parity #206-#208, starting at main 76131ba.

Operator-facing correctness: enableSelected and authored RCB enable diagnostics no longer conflate requested GI with successful GI Write or a received InformationReport. Existing native bounded report lifecycle events expose actual write outcome and accepted/rejected/decode counters, which remain separate. The inspector's selected-member identity now carries the actual active RCB reference in addition to on-wire RptID/SqNum/SubSqNum/EntryID. On indexed RCB switches sharing RptID/sequence, previously highlighted member evidence cannot persist under a different RCB.

Architecture: no new protocol Read/Write, parser, socket, poller, event stream, data store or network work; unchanged native C++/Qt source authority. Updated existing Browser convergence contract to prevent regression.

Field gates remain open: matching current source Windows release package is available from Actions only after checking artifact provenance. Real IED/vendor interoperability and pixel-exact ARSAS screenshot comparison require actual hardware and corresponding reference screenshots; no unsupported acceptance claims.

Acceptance: exact-head native IED Simulator Qt build + 55-step GUI/simulator gates, Product Naming Guard and clean automated review before merge.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-10-17T00:17:59.715160Z 3638103 PR opened
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@masarray
masarray merged commit f52a3f5 into main Oct 17, 2026
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant