[masarray]

Observed field GUI regression

Real desktop screenshot (17 Oct 2026) shows microscopic primary controls: RibbonAction badge was only 7–9 px, caption 8 px, icon box 27×25 and button 66×64. Group captions 7 px, endpoint controls/status 8–9 px; the large title/duplicate model sidebar compete with actionable information. This falls far short of the supplied IEDScout reference's genuine ribbon hierarchy.

Fix

• Enlarge all Browser primary controls to 80×86, icon/badge area to 37×35 and readable 12–16 px badge text plus two-line 11 px semibold captions (including Stop active RCB, Discover IED).
• Increase ribbon height to 112 px, adjust group widths/separators and host/endpoint typography to avoid clipping. Preserve horizontal scrolling for smaller viewports.
• Remove redundant read-only MODEL summary chrome from right of ribbon (identity remains in Engineering Explorer) to reclaim horizontal room for actions.
• Keep all original enabled predicates, exact MMS RCB/session operations, warnings, native service owners, and focus/hover behavior.
• Regression gate test_browser_ribbon_legibility.py in Qt CI checks button hierarchy and live-operation wiring to prevent reverting to tiny icon badges.

Scope

QML Browser ribbon only plus independent static guard and Qt workflow routing. No protocol/transport/RCB changes. Distinct from PR #219 (Reports hierarchy). Exact-head Qt QML smoke + rendered browser evidence, path-scoped CI and clean review are prerequisites to merge. Screenshot parity with installed Windows app remains separate visual acceptance.

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review	Status	Commit	Review trigger
📝 Code Review	✅ Completed 2026-10-17T03:23:34.501776Z	a321d49	Manual request

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: ea650931ae

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

[masarray]

Fixed both exact-head P1 findings on a321d49653d12d7c5009b3bb3505469ef1f6b27d: new ribbon static guard now matches existing multiline session.discoverAndConnect() handler; existing Browser convergence guard now expects 112px ribbon and SERVICES width, not removed miniature 94px/MODEL chrome. Both tests run in native IED Simulator Qt workflow. Please review current exact head. @codex review

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. 👍

Reviewed commit: a321d49653

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".