Open
Conversation
Collaborator
|
@bkueng there are some open comments from David Sidrane. Did anyone else have any more feedback to add? What are next steps? |
|
@hamishwillee I gues this can be closed, since it was implemented in MAVLink? |
Collaborator
|
I'm not sure. My thinking would be "no", on the basis that:
|
Oh true haha 😆 |
Collaborator
|
FWIW it would be good to merge this, but its a bit like dominos. I want component metadata in first. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
MAVLink currently does not provide a mechanism to let one component inform
others about sporadic events or state changes with certain delivery. The most
prominent case is for an autopilot to inform a user via GCS about state changes
(e.g. switching into a failsafe mode). This has traditionally been solved by
sending string text messages that are then displayed directly.
However this has several shortcomings:
The following document serves as a draft for a generic new events interface:
[updated link]: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1VLdnvjG6r6Cw-_FSo9lcG-Nlk7eGA7DaEHhe-3bP4-Q
Everyone is welcome to comment directly in the document. It serves as the main reference point.
@auturgy @dogmaphobic @DonLakeFlyer @hamishwillee