[wip] Generic instrument in parameter

[jenshnielsen]

No description provided.

[jenshnielsen]

Before merging this we need to decide which generic parameters the parameter class should take and which order they should be in. 3.13+ allows some generic arguments to be omitted but since there are no support for kwargs they must be included in order so the first argument should be the one that must be costumized the most often

Candidates are ParamDataType, ParamRawDataType and Instrument.

It probably makes sense that ParamDataType is the first since each Parameter instance may have a different datatype while the Instrument type typically only needs to be customized in a subclass.

Should we include ParamRawData type or just leave it as any (if we include it should it come before or after Instrument)

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 62.12121% with 50 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 58.76%. Comparing base (e22f404) to head (87e601a).
⚠️ Report is 16 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
src/qcodes/parameters/parameter_base.py	52.94%	16 Missing ⚠️
...odes/instrument_drivers/yokogawa/Yokogawa_GS200.py	43.75%	9 Missing ⚠️
src/qcodes/parameters/parameter.py	0.00%	8 Missing ⚠️
...des/instrument_drivers/Keysight/Keysight_N9030B.py	85.18%	4 Missing ⚠️
src/qcodes/parameters/array_parameter.py	0.00%	3 Missing ⚠️
src/qcodes/parameters/multi_parameter.py	0.00%	3 Missing ⚠️
src/qcodes/parameters/parameter_with_setpoints.py	0.00%	3 Missing ⚠️
...rc/qcodes/instrument_drivers/rigol/Rigol_DG1062.py	0.00%	2 Missing ⚠️
src/qcodes/instrument_drivers/AlazarTech/utils.py	66.66%	1 Missing ⚠️
...ent_drivers/QuantumDesign/DynaCoolPPMS/DynaCool.py	75.00%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #7655      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   59.78%   58.76%   -1.03%     
==========================================
  Files         352      352              
  Lines       31659    31666       +7     
==========================================
- Hits        18927    18607     -320     
- Misses      12732    13059     +327     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[jenshnielsen]

We need to agree on this order of generic arguments before merging since changing this would be a breaking change for all Parameter usage and implementations.

Roughly there are three relevant generic parameters for an instrument.

1. ParameterData type (input/output from get/set)
2. InstrumentType (what self.instrument returns)
3. RawParameterData. What is passed to self.write/ask etc

Here I propose that we add 1 and 2 but omit 3 for the time being.
This means that we cannot add 3 before